Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:20 -0800
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] gpiolib: of: remove [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node()
 APIs
Message-ID: <Y6H/PLIxpZmNUaOS@google.com>
References: <20221219192016.1396950-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
 <20221219192016.1396950-5-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
 <Y6HAJCBs3MQxNP29@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y6HAJCBs3MQxNP29@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:01:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:20:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Now that everyone is using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get[_index]() APIs,
> > remove OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node().
> 
> I very much in favour of this change!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> But the same question reminds, how this is possible to exists with the removed
> of_get_named_gpiod_flags()?

As I mentioned in the other email of_get_named_gpiod_flags() is still
present, it is of_get_named_gpio_flags (without the "d") that was
removed.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry