Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760446AbXHPOJZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:09:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761174AbXHPOI7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:08:59 -0400 Received: from rrcs-71-42-183-126.sw.biz.rr.com ([71.42.183.126]:32869 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757118AbXHPOI6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:08:58 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1465 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:08:58 EDT Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP port space. From: Tom Tucker To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Steve Wise , David Miller , mshefty@ichips.intel.com, rdreier@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org In-Reply-To: <46C3B5EF.5060409@garzik.org> References: <46B883B5.8040702@opengridcomputing.com> <46BB61D0.4090101@opengridcomputing.com> <46BB89C0.4040303@ichips.intel.com> <20070809.145534.102938208.davem@davemloft.net> <46C310E1.7020503@opengridcomputing.com> <46C3B5EF.5060409@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:43:11 -0500 Message-Id: <1187271791.4685.9.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1501 Lines: 43 On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 22:26 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: [...snip...] > > I think removing the RDMA stack is the wrong thing to do, and you > > shouldn't just threaten to yank entire subsystems because you don't like > > the technology. Lets keep this constructive, can we? RDMA should get > > the respect of any other technology in Linux. Maybe its a niche in your > > opinion, but come on, there's more RDMA users than say, the sparc64 > > port. Eh? > > It's not about being a niche. It's about creating a maintainable > software net stack that has predictable behavior. Isn't RDMA _part_ of the "software net stack" within Linux? Why isn't making RDMA stable, supportable and maintainable equally as important as any other subsystem? > > Needing to reach out of the RDMA sandbox and reserve net stack resources > away from itself travels a path we've consistently avoided. > > > >> I will NACK any patch that opens up sockets to eat up ports or > >> anything stupid like that. > > > > Got it. > > Ditto for me as well. > > Jeff > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/