Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765137AbXHPQA7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:00:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758098AbXHPQAr (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:00:47 -0400 Received: from x346.tv-sign.ru ([89.108.83.215]:41208 "EHLO mail.screens.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759779AbXHPQAp (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:00:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:03:09 +0400 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Dan Aloni Cc: Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Jarek Poplawski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Message-ID: <20070816160309.GB213@tv-sign.ru> References: <20070701153749.GA111@tv-sign.ru> <20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1321 Lines: 30 On 08/16, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted. > > > > flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc() > > and release_dev() to use cancel_delayed_work_sync/cancel_work_sync. > > > > I am not sure we really need to call do_tty_hangup() when cancel_work_sync() > > returns true, but this matches the current behaviour. > > I also noticed this problem recently with 2.6.22, on a 2-CPU box where there > was one SCHED_RR userspace process stuck in a busy loop. The box was completely > responsive but had this annoyance where all tty closings were stuck in > flush_scheduled_work(). It's especially noticable when you ssh to the machine > and then try to log out. cancel_work_sync(work) can hang too if some SCHED_RR userspace process does not relinquish CPU, but the probability is much lower (it should preempt work->func of that work_struct). see also http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=118115098120503. Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/