Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 20:55:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 20:55:21 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:54533 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 20:55:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 02:54:46 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Marvin Justice Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: highmem question Message-ID: <20011208015446.GC32569@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <01120719300102.00764@bozo> <3C116CC6.2030808@zytor.com> <01120719534703.00764@bozo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01120719534703.00764@bozo> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 07 2001, Marvin Justice wrote: > > There is no way of fixing it. > > All I know is that a streaming io app I was playing with showed a drastic > performance hit when the kernel was compiled with CONFIG_HIGHMEM. On W2K we > saw no slowdown with 2 or even 4GB of RAM so I think solutions must exist. That's because of highmem page bouncing when doing I/O. There is indeed a solution for this -- 2.5 or 2.4 + block-highmem-all patches will happily do I/O directly to any page in your system as long as your hardware supports it. I'm sure we're beating w2k with that enabled :-) -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/