Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934456AbXHPQgJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:36:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761246AbXHPQfP (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:35:15 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:36607 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762580AbXHPQfM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:35:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - Add a .note.SuSE section From: Arjan van de Ven To: Jeff Dike Cc: Andrew Morton , stable@kernel.org, LKML , uml-devel , Alberto Pires de Oliveira Neto , giedrius@su.lt In-Reply-To: <20070816162428.GA8128@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20070816162428.GA8128@c2.user-mode-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:30:56 -0700 Message-Id: <1187281856.2663.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.11.6.1 (2.11.6.1-1.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 18 On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:24 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > [ This is both 2.6.24 and -stable material ] > > SuSE seems to require that binaries have a .note.SuSE section. > Without it, UML segfaults if any parameters are passed on the command > line. this sounds like something really stupid and bad... why would the kernel need to have a per-distro note section??? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/