Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 21:06:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 21:06:03 -0500 Received: from sm13.texas.rr.com ([24.93.35.40]:60331 "EHLO sm13.texas.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 21:05:49 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Marvin Justice Reply-To: mjustice@austin.rr.com To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: highmem question Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 20:10:24 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <01120719534703.00764@bozo> <20011208015446.GC32569@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20011208015446.GC32569@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01120720102404.00764@bozo> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > That's because of highmem page bouncing when doing I/O. There is indeed > a solution for this -- 2.5 or 2.4 + block-highmem-all patches will > happily do I/O directly to any page in your system as long as your > hardware supports it. I'm sure we're beating w2k with that enabled :-) Will your patch lead to better performance than the CONFIGH_HIGHMEM=n case? Unfortunately, W2K with any amount of memory beat Linux with no highmem (see http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0110.3/0375.html ) so my PHB decided to hold off on Linux for now. Marvin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/