Received: by 2002:a05:6358:f14:b0:e5:3b68:ec04 with SMTP id b20csp6385437rwj; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 15:01:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsjiVziRCsw7c5JuAwF9rhuRM+q9g1dgxZjYRjMxot7F5/ZAi7eyDHiwO/zIHDy5tvUvikC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:6da7:b0:a3:22f3:27ca with SMTP id wl39-20020a056a216da700b000a322f327camr5702188pzb.56.1671663682976; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 15:01:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1671663682; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZCYlWYQSyYWJFyqRilZlkrE1cnGZvEQUVHzq50dm9JRsETnANF9rbrRSe+7VuJ3mOR 8uHMA4Bttt6fjfDc2nrml/RbNyoK8rUAvxHMssipbAUnviQhB0Pm0zep6cBJlTnbWcUm YX2733vVdFvMeuleoGa7O9xOwdxuHdnNVm3kA4Vf+Oa3WLVFteQ1/c8mSDzDuxkQHKVm urvGyuAGuNTM9EPprsRUbVF4AitcyxdQj9okiGmMkxbpKwCSDi5oO/Ij27LbSF1XksIb Ousz7BIkmin5R6DRRxnJipKZSIbrmDR1ceT62yqmVC+FHTdld093uw8WBzzUt+mdcV/X vHDA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date :dkim-signature; bh=rWzzIrNyBxl6K1Wmf8xg2ejoEVKHkFTBcNTwucyj8kQ=; b=UyJQjfXQ7E/NdC+afKnUpKHClIhbn+XyGRPPpV0liimNziJPuJ5vxkv1ChMcAaL9hm 3ouMf/RiCzkK7al6gwC403pU/EPErDBpbfjuPOGjVuIzORJoPDzQt00mLxlKEsji2VBk 5ixgq6ucu+KtT/7GqozTBwJUI+aQh4S4JEmZxdhgRwHfiQ5yJRTOKduHo2sjeEEjNiaA IF1yBP9Tw/420EqeTEPgHrLW57Zx/W+8sA8PLYkeYW12ovW1G+ojI6yiFV59rk5PT5jT TeeiNKFg4wfE4bDcV0eWzBptzMLijmfCBjRh2XZbDpAu3CVG6l7EczmhttESEfzSlyKO qpag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=PSJRwbSn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t64-20020a638143000000b004786f5e24f9si17896415pgd.94.2022.12.21.15.01.14; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 15:01:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=PSJRwbSn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234932AbiLUWY0 (ORCPT + 67 others); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 17:24:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36128 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234830AbiLUWYY (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 17:24:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x649.google.com (mail-pl1-x649.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::649]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAB912715A for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 14:24:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x649.google.com with SMTP id h2-20020a170902f54200b0018e56572a4eso137593plf.9 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 14:24:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rWzzIrNyBxl6K1Wmf8xg2ejoEVKHkFTBcNTwucyj8kQ=; b=PSJRwbSnsNcxTt2a7kGfBsa53ywG8CvZCyUeep/UJNa1YKxBVFh2K6jTqJDpjWN1Q3 9m12S0+6tVDsvpDtVBQ4Z/S+9mwzHFMPaB12kQM6ta4XlqCnwfW0VM+jU79DGBP38Pk9 Zkfh6hfwcJhHxLJOqq//z95MGveDlVI+T0clIEInlhJ2yNJn58GNd9yBb7H4CPvT8J6Z v3Ls9alYEMiM3KroqNS1i71pdZMFrd1QQ90W/DwuDUasqrPmwITVFcSim166jG2z8lH4 UpHYu9wAT5oziSgP6GGTRGMz7H8Qa+KwQKO4ft71NeEFPO9B1imJC0D9OJ5UeifL2tQ3 p2RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rWzzIrNyBxl6K1Wmf8xg2ejoEVKHkFTBcNTwucyj8kQ=; b=CKblThP/gRljs23T3dkM3G3VDO4C8ryT/eOQaiYimjXC8r076v22601LGmgKGZtV7x 0bloV16/gee9yxBCdhZP0FTD4JGz9pmXfV9N8xDKtBQeRNUwDCt1l9zFjl6qJaLUtgkk 7ct3hnV7iG9SicyIzTostQFOXtXl6o8nT8ylwSS8Oy06k8VyYfWRaTowdcNbgES+Ay7a p6SMEIZygBR4+2FLwpzby18UfFcGQVkmPG1Q3qc/s8x/TqSiU+3VU+YWU0MISZfERO59 PQ8lM4tLHrhBDJhyrIsu/WdpQ7ygfy39eQ11jBCB3EemhTZmmq/fWp1uRzjqN6/JbW46 15Xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krhPK7Bl7Tp/CTlGKknW2GU5YT3pMTqtLwxdtqjFF05CQeOoSX1 XFO1GaTwk2XxJcHDhySPG/0ZlQgD5dm04Jnq5ro1nrq+7907DXGnydC4hUOf8KVU/YR1WAqjmp8 TUt37+xvtNjstf7jNO3PStntrI4Thu5BhJldWgZMLgS9NkAOp8Vksjw2DSR5OSCDEiIJdZw13 X-Received: from sweer.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:e45]) (user=bgardon job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:90a:540f:b0:219:c40:e5f with SMTP id z15-20020a17090a540f00b002190c400e5fmr352508pjh.49.1671661462067; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 14:24:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:24:04 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog Message-ID: <20221221222418.3307832-1-bgardon@google.com> Subject: [RFC 00/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU From: Ben Gardon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson , David Matlack , Vipin Sharma , Nagareddy Reddy , Ben Gardon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This series makes the Shadow MMU a distinct part of the KVM x86 MMU, implemented in separate files, with a defined interface to common code. When the TDP (Two Dimensional Paging) MMU was added to x86 KVM, it came in a separate file with a (reasonably) clear interface. This lead to many points in the KVM MMU like this: if (tdp_mmu_on()) kvm_tdp_mmu_do_stuff() if (memslots_have_rmaps()) /* Do whatever was being done before */ The implementations of various functions which preceded the TDP MMU have remained scattered around mmu.c with no clear identity or interface. Over the last couple years, the KVM x86 community has settled on calling the KVM MMU implementation which preceded the TDP MMU the "Shadow MMU", as it grew from shadow paging, which supported virtualization on hardware pre-TDP. Splitting it out into separate files will give a clear interface and make it easier to distinguish common x86 MMU code from the code specific to the two implementations. This series is almost all pure refactors, with just one functional change to clean up unnecessary work in the page fault handler, revealed by the refactors. Patches 1 and 2 prepare for the refactor by adding files and exporting functions. (I'm not familiar with the current rules about copyright notices and authorship credit, so I didn't put anything at the top of shadow_mmu.c, but since it's going to be filled with code from mmu.c please let me know if that should change.) Patch 3 is the big move, transferring 3.5K lines from mmu.c to shadow_mmu.c (It may be best if whoever ends up preparing the pull request with this patch just dumps my version and re-does the move so that no code is lost.) Patches 4-6 move the includes for paging_tmpl.h to shadow_mmu.c Patch 9 is the only functional change, removing an unnecessary operation from the TDP MMU PF path. The remaining patches clean up the interface between the Shadow MMU and common MMU code. Patch 3 is an enormous change, and doing it all at once in a single commit all but guarantees merge conflicts and makes it hard to review. I don't have a good answer to this problem as there's no easy way to move 3.5K lines between files. I tried moving the code bit-by-bit but the intermediate steps added complexity and ultimately the 50+ patches it created didn't seem any easier to review. Doing the big move all at once at least makes it easier to get past when doing Git archeology, and doing it at the beggining of the series allows the rest of the commits to still show up in Git blame. I've tested this series on an Intel Skylake host with kvm-unit-tests and selftests. This series builds on 9352e7470a1b4edd2fa9d235420ecc7bc3971bdc. Sean Christopherson suggested I send out another version right before the beginning of a merge window so that we can merge this onto the queue early and have time to pile everything else on top of it. I'll do that once we've flushed out reviews and feedback. Please consider this a replacement for the previous series of rmap refactors I sent out. This replaces all that code movement but does not preclude any of the great pte_list refactor / rename ideas which were discussed there. Thanks everyone for your feedback and happy holidays. Ben Gardon (14): KVM: x86/MMU: Add shadow_mmu.(c|h) KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for the Shadow MMU KVM: x86/MMU: Move the Shadow MMU implementation to shadow_mmu.c KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for paging_tmpl.h KVM: x86/MMU: Move paging_tmpl.h includes to shadow_mmu.c KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up Shadow MMU exports KVM: x86/MMU: Cleanup shrinker interface with Shadow MMU KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up naming of exported Shadow MMU functions KVM: x86/MMU: Only make pages available on Shadow MMU fault KVM: x86/MMU: Fix naming on prepare / commit zap page functions KVM: x86/MMU: Factor Shadow MMU wrprot / clear dirty ops out of mmu.c KVM: x86/MMU: Remove unneeded exports from shadow_mmu.c KVM: x86/MMU: Wrap uses of kvm_handle_gfn_range in mmu.c KVM: x86/MMU: Add kvm_shadow_mmu_ to the last few functions in shadow_mmu.h arch/x86/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/debugfs.c | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4671 ++++--------------------------- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 44 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 13 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c | 3538 +++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h | 114 + 7 files changed, 4296 insertions(+), 4087 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c create mode 100644 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h -- 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog