Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221120101049.2078117-1-guoren@kernel.org> <Y3tPEDvM3aVJmVxF@wendy>
 <CAJF2gTS0FDgV3toa9wZxPhK2G+f4vCtrru7q3R4FXnMkxYmu-w@mail.gmail.com> <20221222001902.zcbwlvqaitvsfb33@mail.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221222001902.zcbwlvqaitvsfb33@mail.google.com>
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 10:43:32 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTSBLk9+V5hvXTNWWi9m7W7PxNNrMo_YgbZNia5oE=7X6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] riscv: patch: Fixup lockdep warning in stop_machine
To:     Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, palmer@dabbelt.com,
        paul.walmsley@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
        mhiramat@kernel.org, changbin.du@intel.com, zong.li@sifive.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 8:19 AM Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Does this patch get merged into riscv tree now? This problem has been there for a long
> time. (I suppose you have received my previous reponse.)
You could take the patch and update it to v3 with your SoB :)

>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:09:45PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:13 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 05:10:49AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Fixes: 0ff7c3b33127 ("riscv: Use text_mutex instead of patch_lock")
> > > > Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> > > > Cc: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
> > > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Hey Guo Ren,
> > >
> > > FYI you're missing a SoB from Chanbin on this patch. They gave one in
> > > their v1 though so you should be able to re-use that?
> > I'm waiting for his SoB. I don't think I could directly use his SoB in
> > v1. I need him to confirm my rewritten commit log for lockdep
> > analysis.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Conor.
> > >
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > >  - Rewrite commit log with lockdep explanation [Guo Ren]
> > > >  - Rebase on v6.1 [Guo Ren]
> > > >
> > > > v1:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20210417023532.354714-1-changbin.du@gmail.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> >  Guo Ren
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Changbin Du


-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren