Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To:     mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com,
        eperezma@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] virtio-net: don't busy poll for cvq command
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:04:23 +0800
Message-Id: <20221222060427.21626-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi all:

The code used to busy poll for cvq command which turns out to have
several side effects:

1) infinite poll for buggy devices
2) bad interaction with scheduler

So this series tries to use sleep + timeout instead of busy polling.

Please review.

Thanks

Jason Wang (4):
  virtio-net: convert rx mode setting to use workqueue
  virtio_ring: switch to use BAD_RING()
  virtio_ring: introduce a per virtqueue waitqueue
  virtio-net: sleep instead of busy waiting for cvq command

 drivers/net/virtio_net.c     | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/virtio.h       |  4 ++
 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1