Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:56:29 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: vmalloc: Avoid of calling __find_vmap_area()
 twise in __vunmap()
Message-ID: <Y6QbvYfvhUI3J7S+@infradead.org>
References: <20221221174454.1085130-1-urezki@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20221221174454.1085130-1-urezki@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

A sorry.  I need more coffee, this is not the cover letter, but the
patch that introduceѕ find_unlink_vmap_area.

> -	spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
> -	unlink_va(va, &vmap_area_root);
> -	spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
> +	if (!list_empty(&va->list)) {
> +		spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
> +		unlink_va(va, &vmap_area_root);
> +		spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
> +	}

As mentioned before, I'd much rather move this into the callers.

> +	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long) addr);
> +	return __remove_vm_area(va);

This can drop the va local variable now.