Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 12:29:37 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc:     Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>,
        Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Steven Barrett <steven@liquorix.net>,
        Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: add vma_has_locality()
Message-Id: <20221222122937.06b9e9f3765e287b91b14954@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOUHufZpbfTCeqteEZt5k-kFZh3-++Gm0Wnc0-O=RFT-K9kzkw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20221222061341.381903-1-yuanchu@google.com>
        <20221222104937.795d2a134ac59c8244d9912c@linux-foundation.org>
        <CAOUHufZpbfTCeqteEZt5k-kFZh3-++Gm0Wnc0-O=RFT-K9kzkw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 12:44:35 -0700 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:49 AM Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:13:40 -0800 Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
> 
> This works; suggested-by probably works even better, since I didn't do
> the follow-up work.
> 
> > > Currently in vm_flags in vm_area_struct, both VM_SEQ_READ and
> > > VM_RAND_READ indicate a lack of locality in accesses to the vma. Some
> > > places that check for locality are missing one of them. We add
> > > vma_has_locality to replace the existing locality checks for clarity.
> >
> > I'm all confused.  Surely VM_SEQ_READ implies locality and VM_RAND_READ
> > indicates no-locality?
> 
> Spatially, yes. But we focus more on the temporal criteria here, i.e.,
> the reuse of an area within a relatively small duration. Both the
> active/inactive LRU and MGLRU rely on this.

Oh.  Why didn't it say that ;)

How about s/locality/recency/g?