Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <65421f5e-6af7-ac1b-d1ec-209c3e45edac@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:55:08 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Add rule on what kind of patches
 are accepted
To:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sashal@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joneslee@google.com
References: <20221222091658.1975240-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
 <4fbc9e89-24af-9d59-dab0-73925ac94df1@gmail.com>
 <5fe3c17b-44c3-1e1a-9ac5-1db8766120f4@linaro.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5fe3c17b-44c3-1e1a-9ac5-1db8766120f4@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/22/22 20:01, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Are there any other examples of problems that can "only" be solved by
>> introducing new features? Or new huge features that are virtually
>> harder to backport?
>>
> 
> Here's an example:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20221222083545.1972489-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org/

I have seen that, but is there an answer for the latter question that
I have asked before?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara