Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 10:44:10 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <202212231044105692444@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From:   <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
To:     <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc:     <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>,
        <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W1BBVENIIGxpbnV4LW5leHRdIHJwbXNnOiB1c2Ugc3Ryc2NweSgpIHRvIGluc3RlYWQgb2Ygc3RybmNweSgp?=
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings.

Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com>
---
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
index c70ad03ff2e9..c7b5b60aef4d 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
@@ -48,9 +48,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
 	}

 	/* don't trust the remote processor for null terminating the name */
-	msg->name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
-
-	strncpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
+	strscpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
 	chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
 	chinfo.dst = rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->addr);

-- 
2.15.2