Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:05:11 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc:     Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>, andersson@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, quic_shazhuss@quicinc.com,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, johan+linaro@kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ahalaney@redhat.com,
        echanude@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add missing i2c nodes
Message-ID: <Y6Wnh+tXPhF6aC1b@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <20221220192854.521647-1-bmasney@redhat.com>
 <20221220192854.521647-5-bmasney@redhat.com>
 <Y6WEzkcP31S2JGrL@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <80ef7460-2c92-1636-96c7-c91b7d5c62e6@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <80ef7460-2c92-1636-96c7-c91b7d5c62e6@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 01:42:32PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 23.12.2022 11:37, Johan Hovold wrote:
 
> >> +			i2c16: i2c@880000 {
> >> +				compatible = "qcom,geni-i2c";
> >> +				reg = <0 0x00880000 0 0x4000>;
> >> +				clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP2_S0_CLK>;
> >> +				clock-names = "se";
> >> +				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 373 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> >> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> > 
> > I'm aware that the two current i2c nodes has these two properties here
> > in the middle, but would you mind moving '#address-cells' and
> > '#size-cells' after 'reg' instead where I'd expect them to be?

> Hm.. we've been sticking them somewhere near the end for the longest
> time for every bus-like, or generally "i have childen" type node..
> I see it's a rather mixed bag in non-qcom SoCs, people just seem to
> put it wherever they please.. The dt spec doesn't seem to mention any
> preference fwiw.

The rationale for placing them under 'reg' is that you keep the
address-related properties together (e.g. 'reg', '#address-cells',
'#size-cells' and 'ranges').

Johan