Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:15:23 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 11/11] dmapool: link blocks across pages
Message-ID: <Y6XiK/THZio8PuJ7@infradead.org>
References: <20221216201625.2362737-1-kbusch@meta.com>
 <20221216201625.2362737-12-kbusch@meta.com>
 <Y6XeJ2mzd8p73J93@infradead.org>
 <d9d58b20-5ce5-ebfd-bcfa-523086b66739@cybernetics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <d9d58b20-5ce5-ebfd-bcfa-523086b66739@cybernetics.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 12:08:54PM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> I previously recommended that they should be size_t because they are
> counting the number of objects in the entire pool, which can be greater
> than 2^32.?? See patch 4 "dmapool: cleanup integer types".

Oh, ok.

> ? However the
> kernel test robot has complained that some of the printk format
> specifiers need to be changed to match the size_t type.

Yes, they do.