Received: by 2002:a05:6358:f14:b0:e5:3b68:ec04 with SMTP id b20csp1676473rwj; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 01:21:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsw8B230plzECJJtfECQpEIgtIJzRNlAd6AeEU9gjajFUe18dKj5I6U05VmewkuZ61WrZa2 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9054:0:b0:580:c75f:44dc with SMTP id n20-20020aa79054000000b00580c75f44dcmr4263024pfo.19.1671873693507; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 01:21:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1671873693; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x71r+uw8gti89zf3Eyurio/YAIOHyT+0BywZcbhh1tAof04FESLHdXzNLtRi/qv04E jFY1BgX1qg63k9IzTYFwk+IMqoX2IUCUBVpxRCVNmdoDiB5Umwx8d2umc6bleicMXhrm OnFl8UAYWlh8bLbUzy4uR8htwvCjLLauk+gKTTNroN+v4I8h395qBdpsHIVq3+meL7Up dY8YcCCWjLJlr8Mb+C3xY/uibycgyKKeQJN8W9sJ4cn7kANtG3hqiB03EIgxtwMLX7I1 oi4OWFD1EUVjyhMssSGMgPqKGgC1LhDwW/vMzHuRtaxLfynGiOIp18gcSTWaz1a3K//u oasQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=pQmV03gr63zIxEQLJlp/l/rFVDlME2OpuCUf6vLIDyc=; b=wSv1cjtjsOirkW7IbbEdzbdYR4XN7asL+xL+1RiEcdcYJsQ/eY34Cp2W80dSbVv/zK ZwIteDafGRWetTZlnArK1IRVYX1KYHpRogfCoPtwsomzlxJ5odWriwW5TSMsdoDmZdOw B1AUNF96syEpfp1ibkCo/oco/nLkRriJoyvg1kxRT8qVamkjlK4B6QihW3R1P8Q/esL9 gY21yiOKuGr1ORxB2sd68u2wRXDgA0LOQXvQaV9uLc252+kiTh/4GMm+m6iRmeqfowJU MkP1TtnNyl0ZBbzXhh9VI0lWGSvycTeJu3RZlQEAe7ocPPTMVfHGM/dw6aAmZLvkw+hw IcxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=BnQNR0Ik; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j13-20020a056a00130d00b005730a1bbac0si5917467pfu.354.2022.12.24.01.21.24; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 01:21:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=BnQNR0Ik; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230219AbiLXIgy (ORCPT + 64 others); Sat, 24 Dec 2022 03:36:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32856 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229487AbiLXIgv (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Dec 2022 03:36:51 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E7E2B4BF for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 00:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067F95D6C5; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 08:36:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1671871009; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pQmV03gr63zIxEQLJlp/l/rFVDlME2OpuCUf6vLIDyc=; b=BnQNR0IkFYcvrcSEOCLDi0VvAmkm6IveJMLqJ/fNJ2bJ1fHvFxvBi/g5HN5HDg8DeHt4pk RtUqsfsLN9fQa5/aCi1vE9OUE8E4hqtGpX4Zoo6keBFG95sGwef1rxyxx1MiTpuihs0qlm 4bd+ymt/zCCHTUSU8/PwX88bzNVRctQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1671871009; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pQmV03gr63zIxEQLJlp/l/rFVDlME2OpuCUf6vLIDyc=; b=TFkc4DCz5hCevAVl4ouqaOTEAw7OVy5oNYm4DDoVMrm+n1b639uBam5Kl4Zu1cR3rh2gWf nTtTAmaGF5jF+2Cw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A7E13489; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 08:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id V9alMyC6pmM8WwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Sat, 24 Dec 2022 08:36:48 +0000 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:36:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87tu1lxknz.wl-tiwai@suse.de> From: Takashi Iwai To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Takashi Iwai , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sound updates for 6.2-rc1 (#2) In-Reply-To: References: <87y1qy2yit.wl-tiwai@suse.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:20:50 +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 2:41 AM Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > A few more updates for 6.2 since the last PR: most of changes are > > about ASoC device-specific fixes. > > > > - Lots of ASoC Intel AVS extensions and refactoring > > Hmm. This doesn't exactly seem to be fixes. > > It does seem to have been in linux-next, so I don't hate it, but I'm > not super-happy about the timing of this all. > > I really was hoping that the last few days of the merge window had > been for actual fixes rather than for new development. To be fair, those patches have been submitted and merged to ASoC subtree already before the merge window opened, but it was slipped from my first PR that was sent earlier due to my vacation, and now they were caught in this second PR. So it'd be only me to be blamed to submit a PR at a late date and not mention that. In anyway, those should have been cooked enough long in linux-next, so I don't think we need to worry too much. thanks, Takashi