Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 24 Dec 2022 06:28:15 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        almasrymina@google.com, alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com,
        anders.roxell@linaro.org, angus.chen@jaguarmicro.com,
        bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com, colin.i.king@gmail.com,
        dave@stgolabs.net, dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com, dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com,
        elic@nvidia.com, eperezma@redhat.com, gautam.dawar@xilinx.com,
        harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
        leiyang@redhat.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, lkft@linaro.org,
        lulu@redhat.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, nathan@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, pizhenwei@bytedance.com, rafaelmendsr@gmail.com,
        ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
        sammler@google.com, set_pte_at@outlook.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
        sgarzare@redhat.com, shaoqin.huang@intel.com,
        si-wei.liu@oracle.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@gmail.com,
        sunnanyong@huawei.com, wangjianli@cdjrlc.com,
        wangrong68@huawei.com, weiyongjun1@huawei.com,
        xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, yuancan@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] virtio,vhost,vdpa: features, fixes, cleanups
Message-ID: <20221224061932-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20221222144343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <CAHk-=wi6Gkr7hJz20+xD=pBuTrseccVgNR9ajU7=Bqbrdk1t4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221223172549-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <CAHk-=whpdP7X+L8RtGsonthr7Ffug=FhR+TrFe3JUyb5-zaYCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221224003445-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <CAHk-=wh_cyzZgYp1pL8MDA6sioB1RndQ_fref=9V+vm9faE7fg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wh_cyzZgYp1pL8MDA6sioB1RndQ_fref=9V+vm9faE7fg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:10:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 9:35 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > They were in  next-20221220 though.
> 
> So, perfect for the *next* merge window.
> 
> Do you understand what the word "next" means? We don't call it
> "linux-this", do we?
> 
> This is not a new rule. Things are supposed to be ready *before* the
> merge window (that's what makes it "next", get it?).
> 
> I will also point you to to
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wj_HcgFZNyZHTLJ7qC2613zphKDtLh6ndciwopZRfH0aQ@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> where I'm being pretty damn clear about things.
> 
> And before you start bleating about "I needed more heads up", never
> mind that this isn't even a new rule, and never mind what that "next"
> word means, let me just point to the 6.1-rc6 notice too:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgUZwX8Sbb8Zvm7FxWVfX6CGuE7x+E16VKoqL7Ok9vv7g@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> and if the meaning of "next" has eluded you all these years, maybe it
> was high time you learnt. Hmm?
> 
>               Linus

Yea I really screwed up with this one. High time I learned that "no
fallout from testing" most likely does not mean "no bugs" but instead
"you forgot to push to next". Putting procedures in place now to
check automatically.


-- 
MST