Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221223132235.16149-1-anand@edgeble.ai> <CA+VMnFz8nQ2DnD6L9cPmoRqk+uohRqTEpak9g=WGJnSBoONmrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+VMnFz8nQ2DnD6L9cPmoRqk+uohRqTEpak9g=WGJnSBoONmrA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>
Date:   Sat, 24 Dec 2022 16:24:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+pv=HP8ckG8dsh-uZ6=k2nMGDGbw3gnh2b1ZWV31mzuYsjNig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 linux-next 1/4] dt-bindings: net: rockchip-dwmac: fix
 rv1126 compatible warning
To:     Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Cc:     Anand Moon <anand@edgeble.ai>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 9:30 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 18:55, Anand Moon <anand@edgeble.ai> wrote:
> >
> > Fix compatible string for RV1126 gmac, and constrain it to
> > be compatible with Synopsys dwmac 4.20a.
> >
> > fix below warning
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1126-edgeble-neu2-io.dtb: ethernet@ffc40000:
> >                  compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> >         ['rockchip,rv1126-gmac', 'snps,dwmac-4.20a'] is too long
> >         'rockchip,rv1126-gmac' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3568-gmac', 'rockchip,rk3588-gmac']
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <anand@edgeble.ai>
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
> > ---
>
> Please add Fixes above SoB.

That and, shouldn't the Signed-off-by: tags be reversed if Anand is
sending this?

Confused,

-- Slade