Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp1238883rwl; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 17:44:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXum9E/x1xAtklw+U2qJLKg9VovatvQ2xBSBeakZ3O7NIh4phmxqEhlLS/zNJRJEfNYLZoGg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:30d4:b0:7a6:5b50:a32c with SMTP id b20-20020a17090630d400b007a65b50a32cmr13002906ejb.12.1672019079136; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 17:44:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672019079; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PcZp/GCBDThgf9BqPG8YA9FL4vKMH3t6uOevXN6Z6RhWx8kwpHVCF6+h/lTGhb87X/ Akig7mdHO5zliooonaoqgeXX7XGccTBvsA8gj7fsmxWaQ74SkdAeHSKGRic36bneHwnq 98poJy3rGiS6HeG0eBfZsbG67DpBwetmjg3UK6rjhaFnmndKtUJ/vb3sao7bLX3HCk2O fZPNynjtnjIs9XuBnf5zz5ny0SWP4ZWZsyCRiVgYvO1KsYDPe/MGa2tdzh7Uy++BrnG+ D7HlHfmFNs7FCAY6FklTdF1zGTc9sjtUB/2R8mt33pRHLEmRIInMK0dmB8Rbi6GmRA0q 5djg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=ypUcwkJS3IflPqPamdLbVda5MBrjMtdYb7Zo/Z5H1ko=; b=KsGlVmqAPeTbzBZMEMAqX0CDIj00x289pOstycyyNwDznSTxGyYSUGX3F4oBofmmvT P0yTuJva5XOtjo1MKMCrTn9Bgts5rd8Kpr72txoITmfuAjTfEZyhpEmFVX1yC2ZBwUxO qli5KswhSJsO4RCOzYcttaaCzQHwR0vbOj48UfxrIw3jXsbm9/wBowurKf+Vn0kdl9nI 6GgTbOfcZ+q9iOqeiF9fYFfFpiImwWNhCt2tU2C4U/Afd91nQKhJjf9w5wiQcZ8w6dRd CTu49VYnLRLITXuZPn8lZQkKR4J/2VRV0ryiwQFNn9ZWpAPGg+tCoQXLny/mza2y7GeR M1eQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e8-20020a056402190800b00482b7282bdfsi6096485edz.89.2022.12.25.17.44.23; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 17:44:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231428AbiLZBKx (ORCPT + 67 others); Sun, 25 Dec 2022 20:10:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55994 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230189AbiLZBKu (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2022 20:10:50 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48AC3C34; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 17:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NgKTr6cc0z4f3nTL; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 09:10:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgBXwLOR9KhjFu0ZAg--.46799S3; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 09:10:43 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/4] blk-iocost: track whether iocg is still online To: Christoph Hellwig , Yu Kuai Cc: tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" References: <20221217030527.1250083-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <20221217030527.1250083-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 09:10:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgBXwLOR9KhjFu0ZAg--.46799S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWruw1xCw48CF1kGrW7ZF4rAFb_yoWDWrg_Zw 1Fva4akwsxKFZ3X34jyw1fXFZIkwn5Gr1kWFWrtasrCryUX3yfCa17ZrWfCa97Gw4xCrW3 Cr98W3yxG34IqjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUb3kFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kI c2xKxwCYjI0SjxkI62AI1cAE67vIY487MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4 AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE 17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMI IF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_WFyUJVCq 3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIda VFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUdHUDUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Christoph ?? 2022/12/21 18:33, Christoph Hellwig ะด??: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 11:05:24AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >> @@ -459,6 +459,8 @@ struct ioc_gq { >> struct blkg_policy_data pd; >> struct ioc *ioc; >> >> + bool online; > > Nit: maybe tab align this field like the fields above it. > >> +static void ioc_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd) >> +{ >> + struct ioc_gq *iocg = pd_to_iocg(pd); >> + struct ioc *ioc = iocg->ioc; >> + unsigned long flags; >> + >> + if (ioc) { > > How could ioc be NULL here? > As I explained in another thread.. pd_offline_fn() can be called without pd_init_fn(), which is a bug from upper layer... blkcg_activate_policy spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); list_for_each_entry_reverse(blkg, &q->blkg_list pd_alloc_fn(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,...) -> failed spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); // release queue_lock here is problematic, this will cause pd_offline_fn called without pd_init_fn. pd_alloc_fn(__GFP_NOWARN,...) Thanks, Kuai > . >