Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764126AbXHQVHl (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:07:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756332AbXHQVHe (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:07:34 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:47859 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754426AbXHQVHe (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:07:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:07:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Mel Gorman cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask() In-Reply-To: <20070817201848.14792.58117.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> Message-ID: References: <20070817201647.14792.2690.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20070817201848.14792.58117.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 458 Lines: 11 On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > Opinions as to why FASTCALL breaks on one machine are welcome. Could we get rid of FASTCALL? AFAIK the compiler should automatically choose the right calling convention? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/