Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9b098bf9-59d7-e58d-aba3-a8055af053c6@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 10:11:44 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: net: motorcomm: add support for
 Motorcomm YT8531
Content-Language: en-US
To:     yanhong wang <yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
References: <20221216070632.11444-1-yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com>
 <20221216070632.11444-6-yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com>
 <994718d8-f3ee-af5e-bda7-f913f66597ce@linaro.org>
 <134a2ead-e272-c32e-b14f-a9e98c8924ac@starfivetech.com>
 <c296cf6b-6c50-205d-d5f5-6095c0a6c523@linaro.org>
 <e03fb7bc-b196-bc8a-b396-fab8686d396b@starfivetech.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <e03fb7bc-b196-bc8a-b396-fab8686d396b@starfivetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 28/12/2022 04:23, yanhong wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/12/27 17:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/12/2022 10:38, yanhong wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This must be false. After referencing ethernet-phy this should be
>>>> unevaluatedProperties: false.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. Parts of this patch exist already, after discussion unanimity was achieved,
>>> i will remove the parts of YT8531 in the next version.
>>
>> I don't understand what does it mean. You sent duplicated patch? If so,
>> please do not... you waste reviewers time.
>>
>> Anyway this entire patch does not meet criteria for submission at all,
>> so please start over from example-schema.
>>
> 
> Sorry, maybe I didn't make it clear, which led to misunderstanding. Motorcomm Inc is also 
> carrying out the upstream of YT8531, and my patch will be duplicated and conflicted 
> with their submission. By communicating with the developers of Motorcomm Inc, the part 
> of YT8531 will be submitted by Motorcomm Inc, so my submission about YT8531 will be withdrawn.

Are they going to apply the feedback received for this series?

Best regards,
Krzysztof