Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:41:40 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: crypto-rockchip patches queued for 6.1
Message-ID: <Y6wdZHlnUIzzreTA@kroah.com>
References: <2236134.UumAgOJHRH@prancing-pony>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2236134.UumAgOJHRH@prancing-pony>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:37:16AM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I couldn't find an existing mail with "[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 N/M] XYZ" to reply 
> to, so I'm just sending an email like this. Hope that's ok.
> 
> In https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/
> tree/queue-6.1 there are a number of patches which start with:
> crypto-rockchip- like crypto-rockchip-add-fallback-for-ahash.patch
> 
> I guess they were (auto) selected as they contain a "Fixes: <commitid>" line. 
> Those 7 patches are actually part of a larger patch set, see here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220927075511.3147847-1-clabbe@baylibre.com/
> 
> All those patches have been merged into Linus' tree for 6.2 and there's a 
> hotfix planned to be submitted for 6.2 here:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/
> commit/?h=v6.2-armsoc/dtsfixes&id=53e8e1e6e9c1653095211a8edf17912f2374bb03
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to queue the whole patch set for 6.1?
> Or (at least) the whole crypto rockchip part as mentioned here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y5mGGrBJaDL6mnQJ@gondor.apana.org.au/ 
> under the "Corentin Labbe (32):" label?

Please provide us a list of the specific git commits and in the order in
which you wish to see them applied and we will be glad to review them.

Looking at random links (that are wrapped and not able to be easily
used) is not going to work well.

thanks,

greg k-h