Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp5596693rwl; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 23:04:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuN6pSgjmTygerMMPFuiksm4c7Z//qE9a+7GO693v2cp5Nnn1E4wqHCM26NJBr5m/0cmi+Z X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a5a1:b0:a7:7c23:6cf4 with SMTP id bc33-20020a056a20a5a100b000a77c236cf4mr39280074pzb.2.1672297472893; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 23:04:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672297472; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QVKjZDyNc3llAyw/4klCBg/Nu8hXdw/aSVkpBtmqhMfHzcgpknD1L2fYkfwXF+EJjv 5ISXWpBiC4MBs4WCqXiqWxJoLoHS/wiCf30y1fCcBwg0QOfW557if5Ik3Mestnm5Xb64 NYpbA5t/ukakUOkkLMUqMz6FAPL+SnVoLfHm7jfHzLdwWP7048wo1gIXMBA2Gc7ksWfH 9PTW+L8nEYMwoPL9H47skvcREErVJJHr7tISVAGqcOTeJmoHo1y3LRNfdQlP+9j8bp4k JNd8iutoPYfEuZ7a+3g6/r6+WWu1fc+pEjUrKCo4TvhM3B0MjUHIq4yxuS89vPhjg9gr xdlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=EHcuXk2x2M1CcAb3dffkptGsLHqzbDdSv/5VLM9Eghw=; b=0RCEzv4slIIYhgSBTvmYOp2ijMYXKzw+1tK8O1PdgqjWt76uTxhAYQxWCippyOOWlz lpDu3fbssPmYwq+6Zl0bxCl8zN5ZjW3UVvKWBqTpw4hj9U7QHbB0QTaVQXNKsi6FtjVk gzfiFPslTR3YqXO7DZduvPumvUUW7Kl0Lq6H6PlJ3nBWDVzHJQGr3P3FO8C4HgwSLNM3 njCEx6/t6lhj00CwfzqQeuboyO3MVm4RqB9TRd8wSVkc0wCrjsHbz2o5ec9/adrFwMva 8uoZ2MNyWBblOnFFVbkL7RT5XZe4HihZw0iqI0/WvdnGZ9e//bB7mL2q38s0irP8DhTa 0RnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d5-20020a656b85000000b00439fb921f8fsi18263644pgw.460.2022.12.28.23.04.24; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 23:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230139AbiL2Gyt (ORCPT + 62 others); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 01:54:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41844 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229685AbiL2Gyq (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 01:54:46 -0500 Received: from loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8287211C39 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 22:54:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [183.166.176.200]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8AxTeuyOa1jhDQJAA--.20532S3; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 14:54:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from [192.168.31.101] (unknown [183.166.176.200]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8AxY+WvOa1jnysPAA--.51080S3; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 14:54:40 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <7a028a4d-71f0-7064-cc1c-0ca50749ef2e@loongson.cn> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 14:54:39 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix irq enable in exception handlers Content-Language: en-US To: Jinyang He , Huacai Chen Cc: WANG Xuerui , Tiezhu Yang , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20221221074238.6699-1-hejinyang@loongson.cn> <8eaea09e-67b0-5e51-4632-2c31a4c56a3e@loongson.cn> <1c578efd-ae8a-2d80-e505-a09b1a2f7eaa@loongson.cn> <2364400d-bb1e-cbe2-8a65-adbe87186938@loongson.cn> From: Qi Hu In-Reply-To: <2364400d-bb1e-cbe2-8a65-adbe87186938@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf8AxY+WvOa1jnysPAA--.51080S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: pkxtxqxorr0wxvrqhubq/1tbiAQAPCWOsMeoKWQABsB X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBjvJXoW3Gr17AFy8KryDJFWkXr43ZFb_yoWDXr1rpr 1kAF1UJryUJr18Xr1Utr1jyryUtr1Ut3WUXr1UJFy8Jr4qyr1qqr18Xr1qgr1UAr48Jr1U Xr15tr129F1UJF7anT9S1TB71UUUUUJqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUj1kv1TuYvTs0mT0YCTnIWj qI5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfYxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUU bfAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s 1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xv wVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW8JVW5JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwA2z4 x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26r4UJVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJr1l n4kS14v26r1Y6r17M2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l57IF6xkI12xvs2x26I8E6x ACxx1l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1Y6r17McIj6I8E 87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41lc7I2V7IY0V AS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwCFI7km 07C267AKxVWUAVWUtwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r 1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWU JVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r 1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUv cSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU88Ma5UUUUU== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/12/29 14:13, Jinyang He wrote: > On 2022-12-29 00:51, Qi Hu wrote: > >> >> On 2022/12/27 18:10, Jinyang He wrote: >>> On 2022-12-27 17:52, Huacai Chen wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jinyang He >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 2022-12-27 15:37, Huacai Chen wrote: >>>>>> Hi, Jinyang, >>>>>> >>>>>> Move die_if_kernel to irq disabled context to solve what? >>>>> For more strict logical. If the code flow go to die in >>>>> die_if_kernel(), >>>>> its interrupt state is enable, that means it may cause schedule. >>>>> So I think it is better to call die_if_kernel() firstly. >>>> die_if_kernel is called with irq enabled in old kernels for several >>>> years, and has no problems. >>> >>> >>> I think because it never call die() in die_if_kernel(). What I do >>> emphasize is that there needs to be more strict logic here than >>> it worked well in the past. I bet if die_if_kernel() was removed, >>> it will still work well in the future. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>    And LBT is >>>>>> surely allowed to be triggered in kernel context. >>>>> I'm not familar with lbt, I just not see any lbt codes in kernel. >>>>> Plz, >>>>> how lbt exception triggered, and how kernel trigger lbt exception? >>>> You can ask Huqi for more details, and this was discussed publicly >>>> last week. >>> >>> To: Qi Hu >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> We really need some help. Can you give us some ideas? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jinyang >>> >> Huacai is correct. The LBT disable exception (BTD) can be triggered >> in kernel context. >> >> If the CSR.ENEU.BTE == 0 [^1], the LBT instructions (these [^2] will >> be used in the kernel) will trigger the exception. >> >> Unfortunately, when you want to do some fpu_{save, restore}, you need >> to use some LBT instructions [^3] [^4]. So if FPD is triggered, LBT >> might still not be enabled, and the 'do_lbt' will be called in the >> kernel context. >> >> Hope the information can help. Thanks. >> >> >> [1] >> https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-Vol1-EN.html#extended-component-unit-enable >> >> [2] >> https://github.com/loongson/linux/pull/4/files#diff-381d03cf86e2796d280e2fc82c005409d5e44b4bbbf90dd0dc17f5f0fa5553f1R140-R184 >> >> [3] >> https://github.com/loongson/linux/pull/4/files#diff-381d03cf86e2796d280e2fc82c005409d5e44b4bbbf90dd0dc17f5f0fa5553f1R218-R230 >> >> [4] >> https://github.com/loongson/linux/pull/4/files#diff-381d03cf86e2796d280e2fc82c005409d5e44b4bbbf90dd0dc17f5f0fa5553f1R236-R263 >> >> > Hi, > > > That's helpful. Thanks! > > > But I still wonder if SXD or ASXD have the same possibility of being > triggered in the kernel mode by sc_save_{lsx, lasx} or other place. Do > we need remove these die_if_kernel codes in do_lasx() and do_lsx()? > > > Jinyang > Hi Jinyang, I think only BTD has this tricky situation, because there is some overlap between FPD/SXD/ASXD and BTD. So, in my view, SXD or ASXD will not be triggered in kernel mode. Thanks. Qi > >> Qi >> >>> >>>> Huacai >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Jinyang >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Huacai >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 3:43 PM Jinyang He >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> The interrupt state can be got by regs->csr_prmd. Once previous >>>>>>> interrupt state is disable, we shouldn't enable interrupt if we >>>>>>> triggered exception which can be triggered in kernel mode. So >>>>>>> conditionally enable interrupt. For those do_\exception which >>>>>>> can not triggered in kernel mode but need enable interrupt, call >>>>>>> die_if_kernel() firstly. And for do_lsx, do_lasx and do_lbt cannot >>>>>>> triggered in kernel mode, too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jinyang He >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>    arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- >>>>>>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c >>>>>>> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c >>>>>>> index 1ea14f6c18d3..3ac7b32d1e15 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c >>>>>>> @@ -340,9 +340,9 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_fpe(struct >>>>>>> pt_regs *regs, unsigned long fcsr) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>           /* Clear FCSR.Cause before enabling interrupts */ >>>>>>>           write_fcsr(LOONGARCH_FCSR0, fcsr & ~mask_fcsr_x(fcsr)); >>>>>>> -       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>> >>>>>>>           die_if_kernel("FP exception in kernel code", regs); >>>>>>> +       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>> >>>>>>>           sig = SIGFPE; >>>>>>>           fault_addr = (void __user *) regs->csr_era; >>>>>>> @@ -432,7 +432,8 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_bp(struct pt_regs >>>>>>> *regs) >>>>>>>           unsigned long era = exception_era(regs); >>>>>>>           irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>> +       if (regs->csr_prmd & CSR_PRMD_PIE) >>>>>>> +               local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           current->thread.trap_nr = read_csr_excode(); >>>>>>>           if (__get_inst(&opcode, (u32 *)era, user)) >>>>>>>                   goto out_sigsegv; >>>>>>> @@ -514,7 +515,8 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_ri(struct pt_regs >>>>>>> *regs) >>>>>>>           unsigned int __user *era = (unsigned int __user >>>>>>> *)exception_era(regs); >>>>>>>           irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>> +       if (regs->csr_prmd & CSR_PRMD_PIE) >>>>>>> +               local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           current->thread.trap_nr = read_csr_excode(); >>>>>>> >>>>>>>           if (notify_die(DIE_RI, "RI Fault", regs, 0, >>>>>>> current->thread.trap_nr, >>>>>>> @@ -606,8 +608,8 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_fpu(struct >>>>>>> pt_regs *regs) >>>>>>>    { >>>>>>>           irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           die_if_kernel("do_fpu invoked from kernel context!", >>>>>>> regs); >>>>>>> +       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           BUG_ON(is_lsx_enabled()); >>>>>>>           BUG_ON(is_lasx_enabled()); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @@ -623,13 +625,13 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_lsx(struct >>>>>>> pt_regs *regs) >>>>>>>    { >>>>>>>           irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +       die_if_kernel("do_lsx invoked from kernel context!", regs); >>>>>>>           local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           if (!cpu_has_lsx) { >>>>>>>                   force_sig(SIGILL); >>>>>>>                   goto out; >>>>>>>           } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -       die_if_kernel("do_lsx invoked from kernel context!", regs); >>>>>>>           BUG_ON(is_lasx_enabled()); >>>>>>> >>>>>>>           preempt_disable(); >>>>>>> @@ -645,14 +647,13 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_lasx(struct >>>>>>> pt_regs *regs) >>>>>>>    { >>>>>>>           irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +       die_if_kernel("do_lasx invoked from kernel context!", >>>>>>> regs); >>>>>>>           local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           if (!cpu_has_lasx) { >>>>>>>                   force_sig(SIGILL); >>>>>>>                   goto out; >>>>>>>           } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -       die_if_kernel("do_lasx invoked from kernel context!", >>>>>>> regs); >>>>>>> - >>>>>>>           preempt_disable(); >>>>>>>           init_restore_lasx(); >>>>>>>           preempt_enable(); >>>>>>> @@ -666,6 +667,7 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_lbt(struct >>>>>>> pt_regs *regs) >>>>>>>    { >>>>>>>           irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +       die_if_kernel("do_lbt invoked from kernel context!", regs); >>>>>>>           local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           force_sig(SIGILL); >>>>>>>           local_irq_disable(); >>>>>>> @@ -677,7 +679,6 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_reserved(struct >>>>>>> pt_regs *regs) >>>>>>>    { >>>>>>>           irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           /* >>>>>>>            * Game over - no way to handle this if it ever >>>>>>> occurs. Most probably >>>>>>>            * caused by a fatal error after another >>>>>>> hardware/software error. >>>>>>> @@ -685,8 +686,8 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_reserved(struct >>>>>>> pt_regs *regs) >>>>>>>           pr_err("Caught reserved exception %u on pid:%d [%s] - >>>>>>> should not happen\n", >>>>>>>                   read_csr_excode(), current->pid, current->comm); >>>>>>>           die_if_kernel("do_reserved exception", regs); >>>>>>> +       local_irq_enable(); >>>>>>>           force_sig(SIGUNUSED); >>>>>>> - >>>>>>>           local_irq_disable(); >>>>>>> >>>>>>>           irqentry_exit(regs, state); >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> 2.34.3 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >