Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S285917AbRLHL1y>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:27:54 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S285914AbRLHL1k>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:27:40 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:45573 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S285913AbRLHL1Y>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:27:24 -0500
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre6 drm-4.0
To: rml@tech9.net (Robert Love)
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 11:35:10 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens), linux-ia64@linuxia64.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (lkml)
In-Reply-To: <1007767634.12114.0.camel@phantasy> from "Robert Love" at Dec 07, 2001 06:27:11 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16Cfl8-000199-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> > How long do people plan to keep drm 4.0 code in their versions of the
> > kernel?
> 
> For 2.5, there probably is no intention of keeping that around.  But can
> we honestly ditch it in the middle of a stable kernel?  Personally I
> don't use it, but its not polite ...

I said it shouldn't have been ditched, Linus overruled. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/