Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com>
To:     Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix ASSERT of em->len when getting extent
Date:   Sat, 31 Dec 2022 16:05:01 +0100
Message-Id: <20221231150501.123205-1-007047221b@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

em->len is incorrectly asserted which is leading to it's
assignment to sectorsize instead of being check for it.

Signed-off-by: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 8bcad9940154..e49358048a98 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7092,7 +7092,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 		 * Other members are not utilized for inline extents.
 		 */
 		ASSERT(em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE);
-		ASSERT(em->len = fs_info->sectorsize);
+		ASSERT(em->len == fs_info->sectorsize);
 
 		ret = read_inline_extent(inode, path, page);
 		if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.34.1