Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S277294AbRLHLyO>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:54:14 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282932AbRLHLxe>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:53:34 -0500
Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:47368 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S282084AbRLHLxZ>;
	Sat, 8 Dec 2001 06:53:25 -0500
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: safemode <safemode@speakeasy.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.17-pre6 still not binutils friendly in drm section 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Dec 2001 02:34:27 CDT."
             <1007796868.9867.0.camel@psuedomode> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 22:53:10 +1100
Message-ID: <7966.1007812390@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08 Dec 2001 02:34:27 -0500, 
safemode <safemode@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>Guess this was missed?    I'm building mga's drm into the kernel.  Of
>course this isn't a problem when building as module. I build a lot of
>drivers as module though but judging from a lack of mails about this i'm
>assuming the number of effected drivers is tiny.  

It would help if you gave some details.  Like what messages, which
binutils?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/