Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 1 Jan 2023 13:29:34 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc:     Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: imx93-pd: No need to set device_driver owner
Message-ID: <20230101052934.GZ6112@T480>
References: <Y6SZjDKWve8/T/ld@qemulion>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y6SZjDKWve8/T/ld@qemulion>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:23:16PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
> device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
> takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
> module_platform_driver() helper function.
> 
> Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
> semantic patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>

Applied, thanks!