Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp10296998rwl; Sun, 1 Jan 2023 23:17:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuZx8rGNzZaWBIOCxb3yrIV0l0TIyGH78rKw7T4NpuxYARaQzdCNnOAcIV7PsBgv60nfCrv X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8492:b0:801:98a4:5725 with SMTP id m18-20020a170906849200b0080198a45725mr34851048ejx.30.1672643860992; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 23:17:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672643860; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IBqcmAXPuVgxtbWaBaNfB87LDs+jLDn0ZDTJfbO2vH0zW9HOPbe7inpX4eP+rE6dkh yjevecDjNHq1mXKsl4KW1Tf8E+PM1h1/UoHEU91CjlT7na5ImsUXyI9dNMUoqTitHu/l jSnZMFXZOdr3XO2/+0896D9QRPpNovjy6dflCkXOlp9rCLDGlI8sNGkVPDHuAulPCPW+ DliY3bE3Fp+53FvQ0f0/tKjdCHynpQsvQ8fTTrlKT7buddFpJSTzmsvDncSoQ2JYcpCg 8h2U7mAvoT4i2BRN3fj3zRHi60zG63U61LuwkypdfMQltMgeOggoF0OhF7gJYW/x3Cq7 wKdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id; bh=IcHomLXNvqB8UtM6i6N1jKAoPC6vPso0lZeMC/JFfFo=; b=S+dLNwLUIW4h12plcMuTo4VQCn/Absr80vIW23+ha/t1ojXkqPIQE/UBFjB9WZ+Mjr Z+oXc5Cgk5KzDfxlg3sDhnOfdQXpnJFtw+f4ffQrLpXWDWcWk+X3ymPIdCaGj10jJQkA 8XecFzG5A5iWCvIEUGidusDKjG7NJC4cK7mCr3SYCR5NnBiMkpfpEhFIBa6sFFtqB+RK ecwfudMuO3VYwkb9r/zNma4hs7rc0uMAVXjuc2GTKMN2FWCm/gpr0ajIF0zTkZ4Wd0ap TNLnB49UIr8EkgtpCf+5wJKq/piZ+V3hoUI9ZnUqPJa2+oFzA15WKky8nWc/xp9JZ4Ad e5YQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gn19-20020a1709070d1300b00791994dfb9esi25568733ejc.491.2023.01.01.23.17.26; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 23:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229582AbjABHIb (ORCPT + 60 others); Mon, 2 Jan 2023 02:08:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60346 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229447AbjABHI3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2023 02:08:29 -0500 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1349E23; Sun, 1 Jan 2023 23:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:eca4:7d19:f9a2:22c5]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:08:18 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 08:08:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: fix broken BuildID for arm64 and riscv Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Nathan Chancellor , Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Dennis Gilmore , Albert Ou , Arnd Bergmann , Jisheng Zhang , Nicolas Schier , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , llvm@lists.linux.dev References: <20221226184537.744960-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> From: "Linux kernel regression tracking (#info)" Reply-To: Thorsten Leemhuis In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1672643306;3df46b7c; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel regressions; all text you find below is based on a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 02.01.23 05:16, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:45:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Dennis Gilmore reports that the BuildID is missing in the arm64 vmlinux >> since commit 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the >> link order of head.o"). > [...] > I just bisected this change as the cause of a few link failures that we > now see in CI with Debian's binutils (2.35.2): > > https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/clangbuiltlinux/continuous-integration2/builds/2Jjl88DXc3YRi2RtvXAzlS8NQ4p/build.log > > This does not appear to be related to clang/LLVM because I can easily > reproduce it with Debian's s390x GCC and binutils building defconfig: > > [...] > > I ended up bisecting binutils for the fix, as I could not reproduce it > with 2.36+. My bisect landed on commit 21401fc7bf6 ("Duplicate output > sections in scripts"): > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=21401fc7bf67dbf73f4a3eda4bcfc58fa4211584 > > Unfortunately, I cannot immediately grok why this commit cause the above > issue nor why the binutils commit resolves it so I figured I would > immediately report it for public investigation's sake and quicker > resolution. Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot: #regzbot ^introduced 99cb0d917ffa1ab628bb67364ca9b162c07699b1 #regzbot title arch: link failures in CI with Debian's binutils #regzbot ignore-activity This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in the footer of this mail. Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags pointing to the report (see page linked in footer for details). Ciao, Thorsten -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr Annoyed by mails like this? Feel free to send them to /dev/null: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#infomails