Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp10494981rwl; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 03:42:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsd/7R+Sg0aXfOHUwjUS/CN/8xg6/VkfpJ+iZodi1RQorEh/xnrMgvyd2JpMnHRl2ChX9DL X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:6699:b0:af:b771:1d01 with SMTP id o25-20020a056a20669900b000afb7711d01mr44154955pzh.49.1672659769432; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:42:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672659769; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sK5G8gj1c2qDC+D5WB4hQRS/InP1Z35s+pteM05OhK1vQbDlEXNE/XVULblTZ/bD96 PaMF8oBS6D3+ysqdepDpABI1IYYUxfGQGSsV63fG/elzDf006iDMcP5s2mhm5ANROyaI p359igRIKZKYw5gO0YqCBdFKN0Jmp0ER9r5pxZ3IjkNhN9IJOfPhyIdiCrTobkK/QNWE ryG5Ru3//+MfchZDN3r8c0vi6LzmgIAtNGbBtufJvAPE9TEVQ/5ypWzAJHd/+JoEwh6f X0poBzzWVDKUjwJNbu7F2N3glnB9uf4FgZar8Uo5mCOk/ye78z3LIDQeSgVCLE3anJ4G FHSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=USmnyjlfh60UWXXDo3KEHQN3fQ80DREWhYWBDoqJb+s=; b=UH7u2H4yyshjNqp3uFA+JCFSSa2iWtitGNMCZYDb77hhap0hWNSsIy6zs0Qgjp5Gs9 Z2BHIHT0g9Iq/9E6YSp3UvtJcAEbqxFaEet8uGQ58tYEbbUurbu87piW1fQjz/QldXyU HtPkBQwkFDDGSi7PxCi2TbkCoXl64V/X3rNCBig6T2tcwAHwIhJrcEll+/FWNG9XNpCk eyCeraGtoS8luQp0FV5fkLqmObGxBFhkqW9vrjETeLgb9d8VOPVzfsP4VK1Y93oxiIc7 72lbB6uk8z2+tMiIFLHogRedjmsiRlPi953hWoKJMn3BYFTOyr5YYZkrxsSSsysehYdm AC2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=YUpS43LJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n2-20020a654cc2000000b0049ac863877asi17202759pgt.523.2023.01.02.03.42.40; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=YUpS43LJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232667AbjABLSL (ORCPT + 60 others); Mon, 2 Jan 2023 06:18:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41634 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232622AbjABLR5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2023 06:17:57 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7916E6314; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 03:17:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id n4so29314832plp.1; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:17:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=USmnyjlfh60UWXXDo3KEHQN3fQ80DREWhYWBDoqJb+s=; b=YUpS43LJBjGD9SWdLchBuieNk6L6+T6s9m6rfZEM9AO5kMZiHl0i+vX9uZY6zqL5YU H08BRogK3Y6XSRYXbugv+HkvkG/x/YAemsmvmpAXhF+fwBxPUxo+K3uHosREzAXidRj3 tZkBT7DdYeM3okwftEhHL9zsVUbXcVDWAu04YD4cIFaKlUT57tpY5rG2Dvl9bM+Zjjgi eQHZRUeB5PGavjL/8h+GYINd9H/pDxKWTBNPV021DFQUV0410c4k6zFsHwMQMmguG4ml a+QZpjsOjxmB4BeYtNGt83BtYWIm7ipHwI2dBeKcnn8TK4Z4qd9GhfXtM2HQnjJOcuf4 gXUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=USmnyjlfh60UWXXDo3KEHQN3fQ80DREWhYWBDoqJb+s=; b=yR7jwz3m9HOIUOwHApdk4MQP09jFI51ohdSg2cc4y8dQZUlPgXkPt/+YZakpSrRXgx TjKTVyDFC1vGNvODORh9vE1K5I1xc9o/hRHHwSvq0DBRQQf54MxsmNeMBmiGO4JlxVam 6ub6sH2xUzsLfgG7+6/uz7kZ9gE4uo9OKdcU1Ld7j8xc6h2LzZz4icCC6gIPrDSTckSw 61nCLmhav232H0DUjjL9m8y593qXuvSR1ERwVu2zWMV3BjfAzcml/MniUAJ/QMfdbJNX wqqM568wSmj5ntp+2acn6KLacieiuUvExukDumr3ZwIB0M9+SJxIap0dVghN6128eOnQ rqaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krMfJl3M99aHgMSQnhk7W5qfr8J9gTnKOFpY5eLxhykblWgF+tP eFJ39D4O+xeWc2HKa/jXXys= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:cf0f:b0:188:f5de:8908 with SMTP id i15-20020a170902cf0f00b00188f5de8908mr42886165plg.65.1672658274820; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:17:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hyeyoo ([114.29.91.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18-20020a170902869200b00192b23b8451sm5808853plo.108.2023.01.02.03.17.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:17:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 20:17:46 +0900 From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: kernel test robot , Vlastimil Babka , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Mike Rapoport , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Paolo Bonzini , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Juergen Gross , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Alexey Makhalov , VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: supervisor write access in kernel mode in __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath Message-ID: References: <202212312021.bc1efe86-oliver.sang@intel.com> <451187de09e9a80f73a0588da65d55d4a8da6552.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <451187de09e9a80f73a0588da65d55d4a8da6552.camel@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 01:08:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Sun, 2023-01-01 at 16:37 +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 03:50:28PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:26:25PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > Greeting, > > > > > > > > FYI, we noticed kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h due to commit (built with gcc-11): > > > > > > > > commit: 0af8489b0216fa1dd83e264bef8063f2632633d7 ("mm, slub: remove percpu slabs with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY") > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > > > > > > > [test failed on linux-next/master c76083fac3bae1a87ae3d005b5cb1cbc761e31d5] > > > > > > > > in testcase: rcutorture > > > > version: > > > > with following parameters: > > > > > > > > runtime: 300s > > > > test: default > > > > torture_type: tasks-tracing > > > > > > > > test-description: rcutorture is rcutorture kernel module load/unload test. > > > > test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G > > > > > > > > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace): > > > > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202212312021.bc1efe86-oliver.sang@intel.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To reproduce: > > > > > > > > # build kernel > > > > cd linux > > > > cp config-6.1.0-rc2-00014-g0af8489b0216 .config > > > > make HOSTCC=gcc-11 CC=gcc-11 ARCH=i386 olddefconfig prepare modules_prepare bzImage modules > > > > make HOSTCC=gcc-11 CC=gcc-11 ARCH=i386 INSTALL_MOD_PATH= modules_install > > > > cd > > > > find lib/ | cpio -o -H newc --quiet | gzip > modules.cgz > > > > > > > > > > > > git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git > > > > cd lkp-tests > > > > bin/lkp qemu -k -m modules.cgz job-script # job-script is attached in this email > > > > > > > > # if come across any failure that blocks the test, > > > > # please remove ~/.lkp and /lkp dir to run from a clean state. > > > > > > I was unable to reproduce in the same way as described above > > > because some files referenced in job-script couldn't be downloaded from > > > download.01.org/0day :( > > > > > > So I just built rcutorture module as builtin > > > and I got weird spinlock bug on commit: 0af8489b0216 > > > ("mm, slub: remove percpu slabs with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY") > > > > (+Cc KVM/Paravirt experts) > > > > > full dmesg added as attachment > > > > > > [ 1387.564837][ T57] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: c108f5f4 > > > [ 1387.566649][ T57] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode > > > [ 1387.567965][ T57] #PF: error_code(0x0003) - permissions violation > > > [ 1387.569439][ T57] *pde = 010001e1 > > > [ 1387.570276][ T57] Oops: 0003 [#1] SMP > > > [ 1387.571149][ T57] CPU: 2 PID: 57 Comm: rcu_torture_rea Tainted: G S 6.1.0-rc2-00010-g0af8489b0216 #2130 63d19ac2b985fca570c354d8750f489755de37ed > > > [ 1387.574673][ T57] EIP: kvm_kick_cpu+0x54/0x90 > > > [ 1387.575802][ T57] Code: 2f c5 01 8b 04 9d e0 d4 4e c4 83 15 14 7b 2f c5 00 83 05 08 6d 2f c5 01 0f b7 0c 30 b8 05 00 00 00 83 15 0c 6d 2f c5 00 31 db <0f> 01 c1 83 05 10 6d 2f c5 01 8b 5d f8 8b 75 fc 83 15 14 6d 2f c5 > > ^^^^^^ > Yes this is the unfamous hypercall patching bug.... > > > > > > So what is happening is that Intel and AMD has a *slightly* different instruction reserved for hypercalls > (paravirt calls from guest to host hypervisor). > > KVM developers made a mistake to be 'nice' to the guests and if the guest uses the wrong hypercall instruction > the KVM attempts to rewrite it with the right instruction. > > That can fail, because to avoid security issues, KVM uses the exact same security context as the instruction itself > (it is as if the instruction was defined such as it overwrote itself) > This means that is the guest memory is marked read-only in the guest paging, then the write will fail and #PF > will happen on the wrong hypercall instruction. > > Here we have the Intel's instruction (VMCALL, 0f 01 C1), and the host machine is likely AMD which uses VMMCALL instruction > which is (0F 01 D9) Oh, right. my host machine is AMD Ryzen and seems I built kernel that does not correctly support the machine. > Now any recent Linux guest is supposed to use a right instruction using the alternatives mechanism, but it can if > the hypervisor passes 'non native' vendor id, like GenunineIntel on AMD machine. [ 0.000000][ T0] KERNEL supported cpus: [ 0.000000][ T0] Intel GenuineIntel [ 0.000000][ T0] Vortex Vortex86 SoC [ 0.000000][ T0] CPU: vendor_id 'AuthenticAMD' unknown, using generic init. [ 0.000000][ T0] CPU: Your system may be unstable. > In my testing using named CPU models like you do '-cpu SandyBridge' still passes through host vendor ID (that is the guest > will see Intel's cpu but with vendor='AutheticAMD') but nobody confirmed me that this is a bug or a feature and I am not > sure if older qemu versions also did this. > > Assuming that your host machine is AMD, > your best bet to check if my theory is right is to boot the guest without triggering the bug, > and check in /proc/cpuinfo if the vendor string is 'GenuineIntel' Same here. the vendor string is AuthenticAMD no matter if I pass -cpu SandyBridge or -cpu host. I didn't even imagine this could happen when using configuration the bot passed without thinking and running it on CPU with different vendor :) Thank you for such a kind explanation! Phew, so this bug was totally unrelated the issue bot reported and I have no clue why the original bug happened. -- Regards, Hyeonggon