Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <207b6699-fe4f-8ab7-5ddb-4eb2e4183c88@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:26:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Use 2 interconnect
 cells
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Cc:     robdclark@gmail.com, quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com,
        dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, sean@poorly.run, airlied@gmail.com,
        daniel@ffwll.ch, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
        andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org,
        quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
        vkoul@kernel.org, a39.skl@gmail.com, quic_khsieh@quicinc.com,
        quic_vpolimer@quicinc.com, swboyd@chromium.org,
        dianders@chromium.org, liushixin2@huawei.com,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>,
        vinod.koul@linaro.org, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
References: <20221230153554.105856-1-robert.foss@linaro.org>
 <20221230153554.105856-9-robert.foss@linaro.org>
 <deb17787-1a5a-89a3-3ecf-7690b4149f5c@linaro.org>
 <CAG3jFysU84LRcqQOspub+9vtsP3syiksrGX6D7i3ff+X6+mbTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8a0d9c5-eb26-c41c-1190-2628977bc582@linaro.org>
 <CAG3jFyuUV79nyjnqNysDKQSyYb4HUSWu-BvxG6LAz1Uavmvkbg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAG3jFyuUV79nyjnqNysDKQSyYb4HUSWu-BvxG6LAz1Uavmvkbg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 03/01/2023 10:24, Robert Foss wrote:
>>>> On which tree/revision did you base this?
>>>
>>> msm/drm-msm-display-for-6.2
>>
>> Then it is not a proper base for DTS changes - you will miss quite some
>> commits. The DTS patches should be based on Bjorn's SoC tree or
>> linux-next (although the latter sometimes can lead to conflicts).
> 
> Alright, then in that case this series needs to be split into 3 parts.
> 
> The dts fixes, remaining dts changes & the remainder of code.

The split of any fixes (or unrelated cleanups) is good idea anyway.
However code can go with DTS - just base on linux-next. If you do not
want to base on linux-next then splitting code from DTS is indeed one
more good way to send it.

> 
> Is this what you'd like to see?

Best regards,
Krzysztof