Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp11742303rwl; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 04:10:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvlBU8tJla6XiRnItedBMMvR7xqRLIqi1veDeo60Db94MurZgnMoHNoIaEF5VY9SbHnbPmd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:430a:b0:7c1:54b9:c688 with SMTP id j10-20020a170906430a00b007c154b9c688mr36602291ejm.60.1672747845329; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 04:10:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672747845; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eRXEaPSunEFF/WKlJufvOP8MJqd9bbPNS/Hahv/uotD1oQ6xQW4w5G2Xl6gkyVcnlC 6z+I/bA91PypErmzyCbLvM+1soH2nl7QyBqkIcHwiQqob7zNGFgOG1nEMm+wGVE8cozq WII0xV5PQo8b5TQChfUzykRpnzWRp6RJodSI4D4a0NiC+IrOJIisfMC0iy99/ERm6tfs czOg1Kix25o7LOr9IVgYU9Pr7Xo/EL5Saiu+QcPLsKNp0p3Y2yoEB8tfho6XPhfPU70M bZr+v2V4pIL0Of+OkSd6xq/0LxKMoM/guGHVeEWCIxDPxrRK6kr3mrUqg8F8a/HGky9Q TCjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=1wZo9x2hB8pVVtRNcNtvPVHD2xbcWBTp1Mk5gyrmOM4=; b=BQWuHRdSnXk4mAH2JCuJ+XjuCpQ0jQRyCD/FnYyCaPvi8UwWTnOswclk93cmObRwcB lLss3jdKxs/W1BMaIIiQFH1FeH3INCJvJciXb7M81UBVhPYpRXMjuo1/SXfg6NHdyXZq 5q99LQBAUlWm4IVraxY5+eTzkfvoX3XdOVaHuoAk+/L/Tb1Ae3MmHJ1fuwCrXNTSuVJv +gyixdXXI5xMqf4hdYsWJQHeYNHtgfavEy2BsNQyN4KMTuMHb5NeTlUCjC+VID3p9uqe 4jyoNZMErLP+EAkGF6td67q2ZpyBVG/U49+h36JSHmw7NRevJlZUpaUs7qVgrfuQk4in muCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=oE+Hpvff; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ji5-20020a170907980500b007addbdb9fbbsi29005236ejc.558.2023.01.03.04.10.31; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 04:10:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=oE+Hpvff; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237446AbjACLyI (ORCPT + 61 others); Tue, 3 Jan 2023 06:54:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47172 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233082AbjACLyF (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2023 06:54:05 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0606572; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 03:54:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A0A06124F; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B01D8C433EF; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:54:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1672746843; bh=/4mB6P2Bm4GaYOrK2xAGD+BWjqC6TeZT/BUcGYXroUI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=oE+HpvffB1aMuaiplglU2hipGASxDz6CXaHX58XITEWtm9XbLkBkqUL/2ddB3w9Qc yqaSl7oN3jI0k+TusgLQuxWxR9Baq3ZFwy+QeiQAl2+C8tMOjHNLrRfyKVvtzsQRnv 3fFEIOR9vhRIUQbKzplX/+Doj2XWeTQ2yE0wg99Enz/YTnsr1EKYIO0dE8VefTvGhf WtxDR2/yg4MwgPyLshBuG1ADxN9QdUQxp/goi6i8qJRfVSdKVenX+gF0iM6bU/HNj8 yzODfjeG3Wqez6T/O5HEwwZFsVXlPzjCn87NAwv0VZ8ukrGY08hj1RxcPsv067J6O7 5igxLQPwt/tgg== Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 05:54:02 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Paul Menzel , Rajat Khandelwal , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rajat.khandelwal@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, kuba@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igc: Mask replay rollover/timeout errors in I225_LMVP Message-ID: <20230103115402.GA848993@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 11:54:24AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 11:34:21AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Am 01.01.23 um 09:32 schrieb Leon Romanovsky: > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 05:56:40PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote: > > > > The CPU logs get flooded with replay rollover/timeout AER errors in > > > > the system with i225_lmvp connected, usually inside thunderbolt devices. > > > > > > > > One of the prominent TBT4 docks we use is HP G4 Hook2, which incorporates > > > > an Intel Foxville chipset, which uses the igc driver. > > > > On connecting ethernet, CPU logs get inundated with these errors. The point > > > > is we shouldn't be spamming the logs with such correctible errors as it > > > > confuses other kernel developers less familiar with PCI errors, support > > > > staff, and users who happen to look at the logs. > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c > > > > +static void igc_mask_aer_replay_correctible(struct igc_adapter *adapter) > > > Shouldn't this igc_mask_aer_replay_correctible function be implemented > > > in drivers/pci/quirks.c and not in igc_probe()? > > > > Probably. Though I think, the PCI quirk file, is getting too big. > > As long as that file is right location, we should use it. > One can refactor quirk file later. If a quirk like this is only needed when the driver is loaded, I think the driver is a better place than drivers/pci/quirks.c. If it's in quirks.c, either we have to replicate driver Kconfig via #ifdefs, or the kernel contains the quirk for systems that don't need it. I'm generally not a fan of simply masking errors because they're annoying. I'd prefer to figure out the root cause and fix it if possible. Or maybe we can tone down or rate-limit the logging so it's not so alarming. Bjorn