Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v3 5/6] printk: introduce
 console_get_next_message() and console_message
In-Reply-To: <Y7L9pdSo9fSmx/F5@alley>
References: <20221221202704.857925-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <20221221202704.857925-6-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <Y7L9pdSo9fSmx/F5@alley>
Date:   Tue, 03 Jan 2023 16:47:21 +0106
Message-ID: <877cy3d3ry.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On 2023-01-02, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
>>  	if (is_extended) {
>>  		len = info_print_ext_header(outbuf, outbuf_sz, r.info);
>>  		len += msg_print_ext_body(outbuf + len, outbuf_sz - len,
>> -					  &r.text_buf[0], r.info->text_len, &r.info->dev_info);
>> +					  r.text_buf, r.info->text_len, &r.info->dev_info);
>
> This probably was not intended.

Actually it was. But such a style change is not appropriate here. Sorry
for trying to slip it in.

John