Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>,
        Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, asahi@lists.linux.dev,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: M2 vgic maintenance interrupt rework pre-NV
Date:   Tue,  3 Jan 2023 17:56:19 +0000
Message-Id: <167276854454.3239244.7195924669135808939.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230103095022.3230946-1-maz@kernel.org>
References: <20230103095022.3230946-1-maz@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 09:50:19 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I've spent the holiday break reviving the Nested Virt KVM/arm64
> implementation[1] and allowing it to work on the Apple M2 SoC. The
> amusing part is that it actually works!
> 
> However, the way the vgic is implemented on this HW is still at odds
> with the rest of the architecture, and requires some hacks, some of
> which are independent of the actual NV code. This is what this series
> is about.
> 
> [...]

Applied to fixes, thanks!

[1/3] KVM: arm64: vgic: Add Apple M2 cpus to the list of broken SEIS implementations
      commit: 4f6202c9fb51cc6a2593ad37d8ddff136b7acef2

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.