Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 11:21:03 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kexec: Remove unnecessary arch hook
Message-ID: <Y7TwnyixithmnizI@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
References: <20221215182339.129803-1-helgaas@kernel.org>
 <Y6KiH2Nf/hMiaPmD@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y6KiH2Nf/hMiaPmD@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Ingo, Boris,

On 12/21/22 at 02:05pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 12/15/22 at 12:23pm, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > 
> > There are no arch-specific things in arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(), so
> > remove it and just use the generic version.
> 
> This patchset looks good to me, thx.
> 
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> 
> Since it cleans up the last arch specific version of
> arch_kexec_kernel_image_load in x86, maybe this patchset can go into x86
> branch?

Could you consider picking this patchset into x86 branch? This is a
clean up on kexec, while the last ARCH using it is x86.

Thanks
Baoquan