Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 07:10:48 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
Cc:     alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        Oleksii_Moisieiev@epam.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        loic.pallardy@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus
Message-ID: <Y7UYaDL82NqFu7vK@kroah.com>
References: <20221222100504.68247-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
 <Y6SIOpsxNdezKCTc@kroah.com>
 <98aa92e9-9ac0-0fe4-a140-ac478e261f94@foss.st.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <98aa92e9-9ac0-0fe4-a140-ac478e261f94@foss.st.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:45:15AM +0100, Gatien CHEVALLIER wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> I've put the "RFC" tag on the the patch set as it is based on bindings that
> are currently under review. It has been submitted with the idea to support
> the bindings proposed by Oleksii. Apart from this and the comments made by
> Krzysztof, there is indeed no more "work" planned on this change.
> 
> Should the "RFC" tag be omitted for the next version?

If you feel it is ready to be merged, yes, then please remove it,
otherwise it's obviously not ready and will not be merged :)

thanks,

greg k-h