Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:21:25 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Marc Perkel <mperkel@yahoo.com>
Cc: Brennan Ashton <comphappy@gmail.com>, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>,
       Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
       Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>,
       Michael Tharp <gxti@partiallystapled.com>,
       LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
       Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [OT] Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
Message-Id: <20070820092125.937d6d2f.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
In-Reply-To: <465458.84259.qm@web52505.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <b2d05de20708200047s6da64412tf6c5afc0b8dea540@mail.gmail.com>
	<465458.84259.qm@web52505.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Organization: YPO4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 902
Lines: 22

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Marc Perkel wrote:

> My rant on VI is to make a point. That point being
> that when you use an editor that totally sucks then
> it's going to cause you to write code that sucks. It
> going to lower your standards. It's going to create a
> culture where poorly done work is considered
> acceptable. When you use an editor as poor as vi then
> the idea that rm * doesn't work becomes acceptable and
> justifiable, as demonstrated here by people who
> ACTUALLY DEFENDED IT.

so enlighten us.  What editor do you use/suggest/push?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/