Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp211962rwl; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:59:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvxBzptSjs3oMjynknRP7U5dtddDX/+9pYN7W923Z3SwVEnv9HThC+6TgXH54mYHUCIRi1x X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da82:0:b0:482:3a35:bb3a with SMTP id q2-20020aa7da82000000b004823a35bb3amr36029765eds.14.1672883956198; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 17:59:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672883956; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QnIAa/BBjyjtoTeVv3t9z0o+VRrdtFpf4Hpi9kCiPFzM6h0dfgyz5t/lbPXLCax+2p b5dBP+vJCPwhbNMiEUcr5j2lP1//2f+PEhOYFWQKLCLpTml1XacmooS7P/7I+6pJbAHf UYW20sNQ49jqpZju+S+4SwMXYtVsP/uWS1WfFJwPsIK9uou6rM3pAz7zu1sXTW5eQjob BR22V76dwJENniJKo7SndH/jwWZ4+foIQFDH9kbB1ILQZBCdItxXzpBKyQkhga/Cvuuc tk7CVnLctoVGuj5XTgj1WhFY/+BZ6xzdqo2e8JUFWjwMTF0I+8vhDhXmFw9pnOJvbAaJ wA2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=ccEsTlqczCFrXbWvfCvGpKw6642RH+GBQTEyVBFAg/Y=; b=NhUKeHNl1jdUuQHahBRMfJC/CG+U93nRwFJh0wGkdFJijrih1WzO30iSeLqoiQBrY9 HC/FW6a0xT+rE7fDhkysQDigLLdWfqqfKWz5RoieYFEL0ca6w2dTa2TUC2VXgA+XVM1K q6bGo0ej0u/qrQvoLxwfq8xT9IHaN+HJlHQDKfvNfD7pvqlBpznFLMF7AZ9bARWt7bA+ cVnXGnqEGyBj++t/ZgDDm9QwkqFqihjtdKPhStnA9OqI/0SXkIbhBYOB77zpAMsh46qa xt5wEZdDsA8oAXOe9KaruK9C3bS4QCivgMjzNVB83vVP/7t5e212//l4Qrc1RX7yJ7OM D0Kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt9-20020a0564020a4900b0048c5062f15bsi11854007edb.386.2023.01.04.17.59.02; Wed, 04 Jan 2023 17:59:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229735AbjAEBnM (ORCPT + 56 others); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 20:43:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229654AbjAEBnH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 20:43:07 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957702F7BD; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:43:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NnTkY1FMDz4f4371; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:43:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAHvbAnK7ZjJJR7BA--.63803S3; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:43:03 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: fix missing pd_online_fn() while activating policy To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=c3=bd?= , Yu Kuai Cc: tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" References: <20230103112833.2013432-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <20230104151241.GA13268@blackbody.suse.cz> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: <4b559d1d-31e4-6049-4548-451bf7afb4f4@huaweicloud.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:43:02 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20230104151241.GA13268@blackbody.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAHvbAnK7ZjJJR7BA--.63803S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtr1rGFy7Cw4DGF1rJw13Jwb_yoWkJFX_Wr 409rnrta1fXan7uFW3JryrXF95KrWIqrWUZr18t3yxJwn7tFZIkr10gryxuasxuw13AFy8 GrWUWa10kryfWjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUba8FF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kI c2xKxwCYjI0SjxkI62AI1cAE67vIY487MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4 AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE 17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMI IF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr1j6rW3 Jr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcS sGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VU1a9aPUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Michal 在 2023/01/04 23:12, Michal Koutný 写道: > Hello. > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 07:28:33PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >> If the policy defines pd_online_fn(), it should be called after >> pd_init_fn(), like blkg_create(). > > Is this based only on code review or has it some negative effects? This is based only on code review, currently the only negative effects is that root blkg from blk-throtl won't call pd_online_fn(). > > I assume this would affect hot-plugged (read after cgroup creation) devices. > > I took a cursory look at: > > blkcg_init_disk > blkg_create > pol->pd_init_fn(blkg->pd[i]); > pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]); > blk_throtl_init > blkcg_activate_policy > pol->pd_init_fn(blkg->pd[i]); > ?? pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]); > > I.e. the pd_online_fn is already called and pd_init_fn is called 2nd > time? No, this is not true, before blkcg_activate_policy() is called, blkg_create() won't see this policy, hence pd_init_fn/pd_online_fn won't be called from blkg_create(). Thanks, Kuai > > Thanks, > Michal >