Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:05:47 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 07/27] block: Remove "select SRCU"
Message-ID: <Y7aE2zzdTyjNId6w@osiris>
References: <20230105003759.GA1769545@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
 <20230105003813.1770367-7-paulmck@kernel.org>
 <1a9d0cdf-d39e-7eb5-39dd-3e425016c579@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1a9d0cdf-d39e-7eb5-39dd-3e425016c579@kernel.dk>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:43:07PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/4/23 5:37 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Now that the SRCU Kconfig option is unconditionally selected, there is
> > no longer any point in selecting it.  Therefore, remove the "select SRCU"
> > Kconfig statements.
> 
> I'm assuming something earlier made this true (only CC'ed on this patch,
> not the cover letter or interesting btis...), then:

I was wondering the same. But it is already unconditionally enabled
since commit 0cd7e350abc4 ("rcu: Make SRCU mandatory").