Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp829050rwl; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 05:16:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXttRwDNLPjN3zQtgyAN9D473btZGCgKn1fY8hcChoU1HvEliVS3vUr2+0+Kw1l05vK/N6c1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2c5:b0:192:cf35:3ff8 with SMTP id s5-20020a17090302c500b00192cf353ff8mr14619458plk.21.1672924584247; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 05:16:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672924584; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sF5HQ2CYBfjYvcphCIve0jFlfAQmIesMM056ytZYmC0Ha8pk3G7ftX+4Lhj7J4LfKb MoUPo9m0mDsipGwriS5M0COuH8mTFAzyDHsxM4M6OPhFbAioufJAYeKBsaqhk0ipewrj tBhbfi17SnksD34j1hfIcsE9UShJiB5riW9EP9IJQnBGd4LaDk8CIMbkqDa8HHZ+A1NT kquOMImF5mLzQr6blNEcfChMsp3J43iVlu/uaSsFN0EP4SOQFiw2kZTh3ABHeI1OKgGu ULqclDtTr7e7ZrvROKsp06Zrda1GPbhKi7cxGRGVPJWLo+AQuqXtrKJ/DIiHQB5TQHk2 bvew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=T3qMRF1GNRdJeDqkXuS2/nTO+iJTQuqw4vXy5aAbbK8=; b=GYm+NIhyFUH1UTynZaGrc/tu/1zJKcIXF53xQ3O8BGzMuzNbGQTvH/1v6bCF9IZ3mT APlvEjzuAT//AIuD9iyHe0ITtqLdjOli4yXFWKsWvIbfTjYdA3XkqKsoASDS9wtH4qYn Xv8SoDJ34Ijx4Hj5LwmEk5rVMrt6CJAMDOD2EVDyRRXz80mmP/30E2h8S+7kar+bb6Gd h4b8nGyaZTpn8J5TvX8JxzRIrIZLnihuwDEbzuKUzxDwmkzvouaQ0QRvYrkrvpxuwnQ9 5f7Znq+XdpjN6K4GUPeEnoeS+DrPBCG/WPXtqAMulnxaBFHmNVWlg+YYlOHCaOc4frP7 DQig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ffwll.ch header.s=google header.b=X+2PEgw8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l9-20020a170902f68900b001869e6efb8asi37403887plg.59.2023.01.05.05.16.15; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 05:16:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ffwll.ch header.s=google header.b=X+2PEgw8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233135AbjAEMuC (ORCPT + 57 others); Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:50:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231851AbjAEMt6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:49:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6A539F90 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 04:49:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id z16so19523774wrw.1 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 04:49:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T3qMRF1GNRdJeDqkXuS2/nTO+iJTQuqw4vXy5aAbbK8=; b=X+2PEgw8rt7VT+EdaBphMOTic4+GLKrNo5BKPs7V4isiRAFuLwaAvBB6hEhMvsxkTp TfkDrSAUw0xWRoTQPLvLromGbOrePs0K7f+ta91kcazZvGWcblftX3Med5BuNdwvXdw1 N0Uwmd5JJ+ifHeVx/lfVVXJJBgQUokhffq46c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T3qMRF1GNRdJeDqkXuS2/nTO+iJTQuqw4vXy5aAbbK8=; b=yyUnq94HdFhLno0L6s46fdBfLy28GHtxuwZdtrjTPYwUuXjLtjbppo9YmpfWLJ+EmO OnEubu2GFZkn1BpAlfZDrtrZ3YN7i9wbga14/N6xyxoSdjd/vA4/yceccXgXGVtlz4Pu mlPcAw6Zp95jwhTnRTUVXQ+rj6xhoGJ3kLNtvyQrM7jP7jdZg+Yu6+fZGS+NOfBiTiUV l+HnIhlnTUKE4E+lT3XJ9GkUprIGAnTRMnO83K4S5Ej7TYDXXJf/OYWyqm78NzRua/8P qzySQIEO5TEn4DYCNzzSsoc2xcKgyY4C0io3qdglkWkVjfCXECOdxayb5M2MaNIVLW+d xhQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kp9Ar2QpvVLG9O0Ho3aU71gBnALHosz8Hy4WdXL/Gcq+4CtyRQw Q3kPhqg8JSGX2kt1kaHRhTFaDg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5965:0:b0:27f:1c70:58c3 with SMTP id e37-20020a5d5965000000b0027f1c7058c3mr22851191wri.24.1672922995942; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 04:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11-20020a5d4ccb000000b002b6bcc0b64dsm382668wrt.4.2023.01.05.04.49.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Jan 2023 04:49:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:49:53 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Rob Clark Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Chia-I Wu , Rob Clark , Abhinav Kumar , Dmitry Baryshkov , Sean Paul , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Add MSM_SUBMIT_BO_NO_IMPLICIT Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Rob Clark , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Chia-I Wu , Rob Clark , Abhinav Kumar , Dmitry Baryshkov , Sean Paul , David Airlie , open list References: <20221206192123.661448-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221206192123.661448-1-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 5.19.0-2-amd64 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:21:23AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > From: Rob Clark > > In cases where implicit sync is used, it is still useful (for things > like sub-allocation, etc) to allow userspace to opt-out of implicit > sync on per-BO basis. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 3 ++- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c | 11 +++++++++++ > include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h | 4 +++- > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c > index 017a512982a2..e0e1199a822f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c > @@ -45,9 +45,10 @@ > * - 1.7.0 - Add MSM_PARAM_SUSPENDS to access suspend count > * - 1.8.0 - Add MSM_BO_CACHED_COHERENT for supported GPUs (a6xx) > * - 1.9.0 - Add MSM_SUBMIT_FENCE_SN_IN > + * - 1.10.0 - Add MSM_SUBMIT_BO_NO_IMPLICIT > */ > #define MSM_VERSION_MAJOR 1 > -#define MSM_VERSION_MINOR 9 > +#define MSM_VERSION_MINOR 10 > #define MSM_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0 > > static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs mode_config_funcs = { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c > index eb3536e3d66a..8bad07a04f85 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c > @@ -334,9 +334,20 @@ static int submit_fence_sync(struct msm_gem_submit *submit, bool no_implicit) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + /* If userspace has determined that explicit fencing is > + * used, it can disable implicit sync on the entire > + * submit: > + */ > if (no_implicit) > continue; > > + /* Otherwise userspace can ask for implicit sync to be > + * disabled on specific buffers. This is useful for internal > + * usermode driver managed buffers, suballocation, etc. > + */ > + if (submit->bos[i].flags & MSM_SUBMIT_BO_NO_IMPLICIT) > + continue; > + > ret = drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies(&submit->base, Won't this break shrinkers and fun stuff like that? It's why we added the new USAGE_OTHER fence slot at least, and also why I wonder whether we shouldn't push this into the helper to make the right call. Every driver kinda needs the same wheel. -Daniel > obj, > write); > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h > index f54b48ef6a2d..329100016e7c 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h > @@ -222,10 +222,12 @@ struct drm_msm_gem_submit_cmd { > #define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_READ 0x0001 > #define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_WRITE 0x0002 > #define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_DUMP 0x0004 > +#define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_NO_IMPLICIT 0x0008 > > #define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_FLAGS (MSM_SUBMIT_BO_READ | \ > MSM_SUBMIT_BO_WRITE | \ > - MSM_SUBMIT_BO_DUMP) > + MSM_SUBMIT_BO_DUMP | \ > + MSM_SUBMIT_BO_NO_IMPLICIT) > > struct drm_msm_gem_submit_bo { > __u32 flags; /* in, mask of MSM_SUBMIT_BO_x */ > -- > 2.38.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch