Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To:     Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
        Carlos Soriano Sanchez <csoriano@redhat.com>,
        <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>, <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Lazar Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
        "Lijo Lazar" <lijo.lazar@amd.com>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: [PATCH v7 08/45] drm/amd: Make SDMA firmware load failures less noisy.
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:00:54 -0600
Message-ID: <20230105170138.717-9-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230105170138.717-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
References: <20230105170138.717-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2023 17:02:07.0569
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e9c89f7f-1ab3-4227-29c3-08daef3e93f1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT113.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW4PR12MB5628
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
        RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham
        autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

When firmware is missing we get failures at every step.
```
[    3.855086] amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: Direct firmware load for amdgpu/green_sardine_sdma.bin failed with error -2
[    3.855087] [drm:amdgpu_sdma_init_microcode [amdgpu]] *ERROR* SDMA: Failed to init firmware "amdgpu/green_sardine_sdma.bin"
[    3.855398] [drm:sdma_v4_0_early_init [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Failed to load sdma firmware!
```
Realistically we don't need all of these, a user can tell from the first one
that request_firmware emitted what happened. Drop the others.

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
index 95e9450f3348..0e1e2521fe25 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
@@ -280,10 +280,8 @@ int amdgpu_sdma_init_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 	}
 
 out:
-	if (err) {
-		DRM_ERROR("SDMA: Failed to init firmware \"%s\"\n", fw_name);
+	if (err)
 		amdgpu_sdma_destroy_inst_ctx(adev, duplicate);
-	}
 	return err;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1