Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 19:52:06 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/4] phy: aquantia: Determine rate adaptation
 support from registers
Message-ID: <20230105175206.h3nmvccnzml2xa5d@skbuf>
References: <20230103220511.3378316-1-sean.anderson@seco.com>
 <20230103220511.3378316-5-sean.anderson@seco.com>
 <20230105140421.bqd2aed6du5mtxn4@skbuf>
 <6ffe6719-648c-36aa-74be-467c8db40531@seco.com>
 <20230105173445.72rvdt4etvteageq@skbuf>
 <3919acb9-04bb-0ca0-07b9-45e96c4dad10@seco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3919acb9-04bb-0ca0-07b9-45e96c4dad10@seco.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:43:47PM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> Again, this is to comply with the existing API assumptions. The current
> code is buggy. Of course, another way around this is to modify the API.
> I have chosen this route because I don't have a situation like you
> described. But if support for that is important to you, I encourage you
> to refactor things.

I don't think I'm aware of a practical situation like that either.
I remember seeing some S32G boards with Aquantia PHYs which use 2500BASE-X
for 2.5G and SGMII for <=1G, but that's about it in terms of protocol switching.
As for Layerscape boards, SERDES protocol switching is a very new concept there,
so they're all going to be provisioned for PAUSE all the way down
(or USXGMII, where that is available).

I just pointed this out because it jumped out to me. I don't have
something against this patch getting accepted as it is.