Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, zhouquan65@huawei.com,
        oleg@redhat.com, sundongxu3@huawei.com, broonie@kernel.org,
        wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ptrace: Use ARM64_SME to guard the SME register enumerations
Date:   Thu,  5 Jan 2023 18:04:01 +0000
Message-Id: <167293131195.1463811.15086370081939565055.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221214135943.379-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com>
References: <20221214135943.379-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 21:59:43 +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> We currently guard REGSET_{SSVE, ZA} using ARM64_SVE for no good reason.
> Both enumerations would be pointless without ARM64_SME and create two empty
> entries in aarch64_regsets[] which would then become part of a process's
> native regset view (they should be ignored though).
> 
> Switch to use ARM64_SME instead.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: ptrace: Use ARM64_SME to guard the SME register enumerations
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/eb9a85261e29

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev