Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:13:16 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/251] 4.9.337-rc1 review
Message-ID: <20230105191316.GA2928293@roeck-us.net>
References: <20230105125334.727282894@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230105125334.727282894@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:52:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> -------------------------------------------
> NOTE:
> 
> This is going to be the LAST 4.9.y release to be made by the stable/LTS
> kernel maintainers.  After this release, it will be end-of-life and you
> should not use it at all.  You should have moved to a newer kernel
> branch by now (as seen on the https://kernel.org/category/releases.html
> page), but if NOT, and this is going to be a real hardship, please
> contact me directly.
> -------------------------------------------
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.337 release.
> There are 251 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 07 Jan 2023 12:52:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 395 pass: 395 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter