Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp1401058rwl; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:03:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXv9IBuOSe1oIa/7FlDWyeSx94g0+mfm4W6gIewbM0JY+V0h/j/rxOhyBK103L7J84JfkKdq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1819:b0:463:c960:7589 with SMTP id g25-20020a056402181900b00463c9607589mr43545773edy.40.1672952612245; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:03:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1672952612; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PBqMyhWMPuUO+COFpeS8sdqVX2CoIt0pzIQkG1BSfFVHIo0PWOYwBBuWJS1CW4ZzMa NOX15YrfmMVMy13b/HoU2viYwjuV59Lt07KHoiBHNVwMdK3k1F5PIKSJS/IRKW6d9n6E aXwtZdyjAK9z1www4ItVWXiqG30pMR5jb60mX+aY1IC4UtDYtQvMme8IEjnsRrvc1i7C etmrGJagSl8mmaE6AuiqPcm9bawyhZNdjYa1SXCdJesbGUiKbYs/cXwGUq43KMfitEpK epnNDj82XGf3Hn5ELwUCMHMOw4zC0Xcm/q/DhboHo8rUcmQ/PNchuUTcTZRTpmZ7a8dZ 9S7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender:dkim-signature; bh=yH3Tvl5j/auFs5EofkFFwMToGeamd+cjbW01wMv5dGs=; b=DEQEEQ0Vp97bbD9h7lET+X7c8JnR83di/pwOw5nHLNtDrp/q1B5PDvDgn+f1vCem+R tSdImjvVact3m99oFGWSXFtTcMZH9iEOtf63dXTpCAH/M6kect0NTBOyfhkfO+98CzeY AMnTWSi2h3qqs5hN/w7TvSHSrp8hPHnu4+CsLgb+DDqsixBI9Uq+3zNE4qSMizdjjD+a ajdjH7yVn1Q2AItkYeru4Qz5oWfwQMw2RqIzzwgWPBBAXjNLwWkLE6oOUCVEAoRhT95L Ijr6zBQ3S/tqN3yB5LsHXxpc3617HX3SQIsIrYPGXMg1gOBJAsRlcO3Z91SI+LXI4Sxm KmCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=cry0C1wh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h19-20020a056402281300b0046bce131279si23922769ede.13.2023.01.05.13.03.19; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:03:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=cry0C1wh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234508AbjAEUcj (ORCPT + 55 others); Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:32:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60548 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235124AbjAEUch (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:32:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682A2633AB; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:32:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d3so40527651plr.10; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 12:32:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yH3Tvl5j/auFs5EofkFFwMToGeamd+cjbW01wMv5dGs=; b=cry0C1whjkisdOk3goZdLucvhl5tO/pQzF+Yraax/vP8nDaaoelHcvOQiPgPS8TFh7 zWNML6l/V3XxkzB9bhC+AaW7nQYgn/OghhSDZpGRLUKjU7j0Nd9F2Hwgf3MNsoAXiTlb 7I1KkoMqmf2yMmFcLkctjJNW55exKk9trG6ISmYXyVKEQlgVKolyDswfDSynBzX593jJ XRDHtEG+fRoIVUXD40H7MPK6fcRE195XY2Xr/1YoX/qq66mDmqNkjD4ZnKgfmtUrTwrw g4Ht3Luo/OzbL+3bX3tX1C/jfna17wFwq4VGn7gbom4FBDiyEK7buNJgNBHSvYpzy1Iw PGBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=yH3Tvl5j/auFs5EofkFFwMToGeamd+cjbW01wMv5dGs=; b=OyapNw3QKrEEILixcCBPoWcZTT2KnGkuUPsrKk4vhaW/XOWLLU1sm7xSMbvTcs1rsr k7jxWJQHGewNAaeXQVP/qkaGk5ujIsZsc2DaEkUSAXW6+Jtyn+Gaqe3Pys8BUwc6km+i Axm9t3XvLgqP0QZxMr5eOjRZqDCKazRD7I6Lpk1nKbV0c87YqnuHtc2mIR3AIuoBwQpC OGLU4XzA65dFrQYxFgI89dmnRpT0iD6DuQYXdgvRz6761SkC2W54muY/XTl75FOOMKQD kIH0HbSmNgKPYtTJKA4+QkXflqjfSa+oN34R7ESgD+1kwYnhP05WGevOX6Nb+SaKjQEM ND5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr41tBzuWzT9W4Oc3xlv9163AkiZu3CdBwkPxXMxNTnbTzFwCKD h7G/j0r1L4WLnDN0ozPSOkg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8f86:b0:191:282:5d6c with SMTP id z6-20020a1709028f8600b0019102825d6cmr60710749plo.61.1672950754627; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 12:32:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from balhae.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([2601:647:6780:ff0:5bea:f9dc:5991:f6e6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1-20020a170902ea0100b00178143a728esm26559841plg.275.2023.01.05.12.32.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Jan 2023 12:32:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: Namhyung Kim From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Song Liu Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Davidlohr Bueso , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC/PATCH] perf lock contention: Add -o/--lock-owner option Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:32:31 -0800 Message-Id: <20230105203231.1598936-1-namhyung@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When there're many lock contentions in the system, people sometimes want to know who caused the contention, IOW who's the owner of the locks. The -o/--lock-owner option tries to follow the lock owners for the contended mutexes and rwsems from BPF, and then attributes the contention time to the owner instead of the waiter. It's a best effort approach to get the owner info at the time of the contention and doesn't guarantee to have the precise tracking of owners if it's changing over time. Currently it only handles mutex and rwsem that have owner field in their struct and it basically points to a task_struct that owns the lock at the moment. Technically its type is atomic_long_t and it comes with some LSB bits used for other meaninigs. So it needs to clear them when casting it to a pointer to task_struct. Also the atomic_long_t is a typedef of the atomic 32 or 64 bit types depending on arch which is a wrapper struct for the counter value. I'm not aware of proper ways to access those kernel atomic types from BPF so I just read the internal counter value directly. Please let me know if there's a better way. When -o/--lock-owner option is used, it goes to the task aggregation mode like -t/--threads option does. However it cannot get the owner for other lock types like spinlock and sometimes even for mutex. $ sudo ./perf lock con -abo -- ./perf bench sched pipe # Running 'sched/pipe' benchmark: # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes Total time: 4.766 [sec] 4.766540 usecs/op 209795 ops/sec contended total wait max wait avg wait pid owner 403 565.32 us 26.81 us 1.40 us -1 Unknown 4 27.99 us 8.57 us 7.00 us 1583145 sched-pipe 1 8.25 us 8.25 us 8.25 us 1583144 sched-pipe 1 2.03 us 2.03 us 2.03 us 5068 chrome As you can see, the owner is unknown for the most cases. But if we filter only for the mutex locks, it'd more likely get the onwers. $ sudo ./perf lock con -abo -Y mutex -- ./perf bench sched pipe # Running 'sched/pipe' benchmark: # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes Total time: 4.910 [sec] 4.910435 usecs/op 203647 ops/sec contended total wait max wait avg wait pid owner 2 15.50 us 8.29 us 7.75 us 1582852 sched-pipe 7 7.20 us 2.47 us 1.03 us -1 Unknown 1 6.74 us 6.74 us 6.74 us 1582851 sched-pipe Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt | 5 ++ tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 49 ++++++++++++--- tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c | 1 + .../perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++-- tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt index 0f9f720e599d..a41c8acc7002 100644 --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt @@ -172,6 +172,11 @@ CONTENTION OPTIONS --lock-addr:: Show lock contention stat by address +-o:: +--lock-owner:: + Show lock contention stat by owners. Implies --threads and + requires --use-bpf. + -Y:: --type-filter=:: Show lock contention only for given lock types (comma separated list). diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c index 718b82bfcdff..5a3ed5a2bd3d 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static struct rb_root thread_stats; static bool combine_locks; static bool show_thread_stats; static bool show_lock_addrs; +static bool show_lock_owner; static bool use_bpf; static unsigned long bpf_map_entries = 10240; static int max_stack_depth = CONTENTION_STACK_DEPTH; @@ -1567,7 +1568,8 @@ static void print_contention_result(struct lock_contention *con) switch (aggr_mode) { case LOCK_AGGR_TASK: - pr_info(" %10s %s\n\n", "pid", "comm"); + pr_info(" %10s %s\n\n", "pid", + show_lock_owner ? "owner" : "comm"); break; case LOCK_AGGR_CALLER: pr_info(" %10s %s\n\n", "type", "caller"); @@ -1607,7 +1609,8 @@ static void print_contention_result(struct lock_contention *con) case LOCK_AGGR_TASK: pid = st->addr; t = perf_session__findnew(session, pid); - pr_info(" %10d %s\n", pid, thread__comm_str(t)); + pr_info(" %10d %s\n", + pid, pid == -1 ? "Unknown" : thread__comm_str(t)); break; case LOCK_AGGR_ADDR: pr_info(" %016llx %s\n", (unsigned long long)st->addr, @@ -1718,6 +1721,37 @@ static void sighandler(int sig __maybe_unused) { } +static int check_lock_contention_options(const struct option *options, + const char * const *usage) + +{ + if (show_thread_stats && show_lock_addrs) { + pr_err("Cannot use thread and addr mode together\n"); + parse_options_usage(usage, options, "threads", 0); + parse_options_usage(NULL, options, "lock-addr", 0); + return -1; + } + + if (show_lock_owner && !use_bpf) { + pr_err("Lock owners are available only with BPF\n"); + parse_options_usage(usage, options, "lock-owner", 0); + parse_options_usage(NULL, options, "use-bpf", 0); + return -1; + } + + if (show_lock_owner && show_lock_addrs) { + pr_err("Cannot use owner and addr mode together\n"); + parse_options_usage(usage, options, "lock-owner", 0); + parse_options_usage(NULL, options, "lock-addr", 0); + return -1; + } + + if (show_lock_owner) + show_thread_stats = true; + + return 0; +} + static int __cmd_contention(int argc, const char **argv) { int err = -EINVAL; @@ -1742,6 +1776,7 @@ static int __cmd_contention(int argc, const char **argv) .max_stack = max_stack_depth, .stack_skip = stack_skip, .filters = &filters, + .owner = show_lock_owner, }; session = perf_session__new(use_bpf ? NULL : &data, &eops); @@ -2188,6 +2223,7 @@ int cmd_lock(int argc, const char **argv) "Filter specific type of locks", parse_lock_type), OPT_CALLBACK('L', "lock-filter", NULL, "ADDRS/NAMES", "Filter specific address/symbol of locks", parse_lock_addr), + OPT_BOOLEAN('o', "lock-owner", &show_lock_owner, "show lock owners instead of waiters"), OPT_PARENT(lock_options) }; @@ -2258,14 +2294,9 @@ int cmd_lock(int argc, const char **argv) contention_usage, 0); } - if (show_thread_stats && show_lock_addrs) { - pr_err("Cannot use thread and addr mode together\n"); - parse_options_usage(contention_usage, contention_options, - "threads", 0); - parse_options_usage(NULL, contention_options, - "lock-addr", 0); + if (check_lock_contention_options(contention_options, + contention_usage) < 0) return -1; - } rc = __cmd_contention(argc, argv); } else { diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c index 0236334fd69b..709d418be873 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ int lock_contention_prepare(struct lock_contention *con) /* these don't work well if in the rodata section */ skel->bss->stack_skip = con->stack_skip; skel->bss->aggr_mode = con->aggr_mode; + skel->bss->lock_owner = con->owner; lock_contention_bpf__attach(skel); return 0; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c index ad0ca5d50557..a035a267b08e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c @@ -10,6 +10,14 @@ /* default buffer size */ #define MAX_ENTRIES 10240 +/* lock contention flags from include/trace/events/lock.h */ +#define LCB_F_SPIN (1U << 0) +#define LCB_F_READ (1U << 1) +#define LCB_F_WRITE (1U << 2) +#define LCB_F_RT (1U << 3) +#define LCB_F_PERCPU (1U << 4) +#define LCB_F_MUTEX (1U << 5) + struct tstamp_data { __u64 timestamp; __u64 lock; @@ -83,6 +91,7 @@ int has_task; int has_type; int has_addr; int stack_skip; +int lock_owner; /* determine the key of lock stat */ int aggr_mode; @@ -131,17 +140,24 @@ static inline int can_record(u64 *ctx) return 1; } -static inline void update_task_data(__u32 pid) +static inline int update_task_data(struct task_struct *task) { struct contention_task_data *p; + int pid, err; + + err = bpf_core_read(&pid, sizeof(pid), &task->pid); + if (err) + return -1; p = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&task_data, &pid); if (p == NULL) { - struct contention_task_data data; + struct contention_task_data data = {}; - bpf_get_current_comm(data.comm, sizeof(data.comm)); + BPF_CORE_READ_STR_INTO(&data.comm, task, comm); bpf_map_update_elem(&task_data, &pid, &data, BPF_NOEXIST); } + + return 0; } SEC("tp_btf/contention_begin") @@ -178,6 +194,38 @@ int contention_begin(u64 *ctx) BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | stack_skip); if (pelem->stack_id < 0) lost++; + } else if (aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_TASK) { + struct task_struct *task; + + if (lock_owner) { + if (pelem->flags & LCB_F_MUTEX) { + struct mutex *lock = (void *)pelem->lock; + unsigned long owner = BPF_CORE_READ(lock, owner.counter); + + task = (void *)(owner & ~7UL); + } else if (pelem->flags == LCB_F_READ || pelem->flags == LCB_F_WRITE) { + struct rw_semaphore *lock = (void *)pelem->lock; + unsigned long owner = BPF_CORE_READ(lock, owner.counter); + + task = (void *)(owner & ~7UL); + } else { + task = NULL; + } + + /* The flags is not used anymore. Pass the owner pid. */ + if (task) + pelem->flags = BPF_CORE_READ(task, pid); + else + pelem->flags = -1U; + + } else { + task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); + } + + if (task) { + if (update_task_data(task) < 0 && lock_owner) + pelem->flags = -1U; + } } return 0; @@ -207,8 +255,10 @@ int contention_end(u64 *ctx) key.aggr_key = pelem->stack_id; break; case LOCK_AGGR_TASK: - key.aggr_key = pid; - update_task_data(pid); + if (lock_owner) + key.aggr_key = pelem->flags; + else + key.aggr_key = pid; break; case LOCK_AGGR_ADDR: key.aggr_key = pelem->lock; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h b/tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h index b99e83fccf5c..862b0617698a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ struct lock_contention { int max_stack; int stack_skip; int aggr_mode; + int owner; }; #ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL -- 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog