Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:35:39 +0700
From:   Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To:     Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
        io-uring Mailing List <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, liqiong@nfschina.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment
Message-ID: <Y7fra/JE003tcpQq@integral2>
References: <20230106091242.20288-1-yuzhe@nfschina.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230106091242.20288-1-yuzhe@nfschina.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote:
> @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb)
>  	 * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the
>  	 * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it.
>  	 * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with
> -	 * work cancelation off the exec path.
> +	 * work cancellation off the exec path.
>  	 */
>  	if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle))
>  		io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx);
> @@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
>  		bool loop = false;
>  
>  		io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
> -		/* read completions before cancelations */
> +		/* read completions before cancellations */

"cancelations" is not a typo.

"cancelations" and "cancellations" are both valid spellings. The former
is predominantly used in the US, while the latter is predominantly used
in the UK.

-- 
Ammar Faizi