Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 13:03:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 13:03:22 -0500 Received: from adsl-206-170-148-147.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([206.170.148.147]:10256 "EHLO gw.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 13:02:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Ext2 directory index: ALS paper and benchmarks From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Ragnar =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kj=F8rstad?= , Hans Reiser , Linux Kernel List , reiserfs-dev@namesys.com In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <3C0EE8DD.3080108@namesys.com> <20011206122753.A9253@vestdata.no> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 08 Dec 2001 10:02:02 -0800 Message-Id: <1007834523.2566.2.camel@ixodes.goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 07:51, Daniel Phillips wrote: > I did try R5 in htree, and at least a dozen other hashes. R5 was the worst > of the bunch, in terms of uniformity of distribution, and caused a measurable > slowdown in Htree performance. (Not an order of magnitude, mind you, > something closer to 15%.) Did you try the ReiserFS teahash? I wrote it specifically to address the issue you mentioned in the paper of an attacker deliberately generating collisions; the intention was that each directory (or maybe filesystem) have its own distinct hashing key. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/