Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:47:18 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-6.2-fixes] block: Drop spurious might_sleep()
 from blk_put_queue()
Message-ID: <Y7iI1gVcUHLwhQjl@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <Y7g3L6fntnTtOm63@kili>
 <Y7hbYPSdLqW++y/p@slm.duckdns.org>
 <9ac3390c-055b-546c-f1f4-68350dfe04f8@kernel.dk>
 <Y7iFwjN+XzWvLv3y@slm.duckdns.org>
 <Y7iIWA6h88cYjhcO@bombadil.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y7iIWA6h88cYjhcO@bombadil.infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 12:45:12PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> *tons* has changed since e8c7d14ac6c3 and so the bots might think that
> *if* this patch is applied upstream it is justified for older kernels
> and I don't think that's yet been verified and doubt it.

Didn't look like anything relevant changed to me. Besides, all that the
patch does is removing a might_sleep() which can't hurt anything.

-- 
tejun