Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp3193926rwl; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 17:38:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsQpVDkzhCDMFIRywZlcTk6oEQ5VaXuCdfZtBETHoO0wlFJ2liPTJxxS78/p9TzxKS7kYiD X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8a0b:b0:226:faa:f0cd with SMTP id w11-20020a17090a8a0b00b002260faaf0cdmr37934520pjn.4.1673055489741; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:38:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673055489; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KomwqON0XwbRX6WVrzfsOsIQLZofZfzEct6DqPg9J4vqsvtfY3F89SwknXCvdtazew ybiAWUfpD9fMX8wIcRsqmrekqFskLApMKp9PKw6IIhgeUS106fEBA7PzlzziDzM8WwJI +5nig04lVG6p4eU/GMXpRIx3mYU69fux02gYNhaJ8EDT6Yh17WfGJj9veKjd1VlJXjAk Nltdmrg7FqcPeVMrxNHY5OMMRTOqtb+mPp8KVvTgAN/2yy9q/tX8KnKKOm1BvR12vVuT xrS4+NkasIXiVCGbFFh/1KyHGR1M4eimYvonzsFwc1kAdljTcAUOw17VuAHON8H4phRJ 3wSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date :reply-to:dkim-signature; bh=tmPQz2zK/dB2NTddZcwOldRAv/bdux625ajDDkMbuHk=; b=bWQDsnOkEs1+DJ6rvtB6cOXgX4ruImyt1oxgVBtQSqRj8lVPBVbK+XL5/MyffVSryV 2GudR01UWPtk+Vy+tn2IOKkyCL1AqVa+mgxz3oezLDidS1jtsaAEZmQOOsPGfAG02n8W i2v0JnFhcmkPqcviz6h0uxFX00BC60clQUn18ua43KllBRa83Ptu6iIDupsif0D3rphz 5dnLhHa01CfHUwMACOgEcl5qbTjPUtT2LzrVczFLS4ZZOoli4DdS7IRUHOqXhVL+Ogtp HyN0rVs5mfBG80WP0F6W4hk4By7IjHMLTpBz+7Pl5jwfcK5zuTvYf4V3w3eWbui44THM B7LA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=iVjG2Dn6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16-20020a630510000000b0046ff400d209si2982760pgf.724.2023.01.06.17.38.02; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:38:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=iVjG2Dn6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236779AbjAGBKd (ORCPT + 55 others); Fri, 6 Jan 2023 20:10:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230201AbjAGBKb (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2023 20:10:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x549.google.com (mail-pg1-x549.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::549]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CA89848CA for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 17:10:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x549.google.com with SMTP id g32-20020a635660000000b00478c21b8095so1716749pgm.10 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:10:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:reply-to:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tmPQz2zK/dB2NTddZcwOldRAv/bdux625ajDDkMbuHk=; b=iVjG2Dn6BJBzk+IgWmNfLGDv0w9EAWaRFXsphtRQSAQogeDcidQWbOJOEL9duYesJ/ KWgDMbu4JmoKcdGX+lRkcZJI8sj5+OehlPoaXX6DRMHhzmH9xOL6cKV66kWdbv5/RJS5 elAJ6VyypAiWCYbthqFbOqweSBkK8T0gZ69W1CdMqAWKyt+rLgVh5fVUQBARpb7rKn2F WO1PHNNDA15lrQB112fSwfFiJkFSpOJwTindRe9H/IW+GBwq9u8H7AbOxrz2Qva4AgqY 3v3FDloHFh8hNU0yeDR8x48dZJ6AYiDSKqOytKmScNhcEErtpbP0Y3cH6mT8S6F3eF/b BOew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:reply-to :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tmPQz2zK/dB2NTddZcwOldRAv/bdux625ajDDkMbuHk=; b=PR2GtLNfqTEHT7F9RVzEDVBW8IrIdl+Bih2lTTH83IJAKZ/Q5azE7k20sT7etXgLr+ i5AoxvBGqljWGQ1LzXTOshqm+rLIvOyVoxIDGORpoj3lmVZhKKzlYwS2KtYtFxTwCfno H3o2xLM6kkjm80Z40cedZIlXumrZWk9tJ9Iy0mjtwOGbthS4ipUGT7OMdmD4p+VknlLn G6nCSOdUcvHaLfLa2K2+Mm6bJjeTXvmduKmWLMNphorMjWYNIn+XMXG2zR37tNEc74Ik Dd2pD3rSjBtPbxvtC8qGaYbsghoYdYNRpCQfFJwer2sB9URHmZDl2W/kzWT8D5c0wIZN gXBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krrmSxKYIvV1BVHElRJX4FlTVZlNjfh/EoGyK0lWrGWRL4EOeo2 jcHZWUXAktyo46Wz/KDy8iA9dT7lKdk= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6a00:4394:b0:585:ff31:600 with SMTP id bt20-20020a056a00439400b00585ff310600mr108443pfb.51.1673053828686; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:10:28 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 01:10:19 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog Message-ID: <20230107011025.565472-1-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: x2APIC reserved bits/regs fixes From: Sean Christopherson To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Orr , Ben Gardon , Venkatesh Srinivas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes for edge cases where KVM mishandles reserved bits/regs checks when the vCPU is in x2APIC mode. The first two patches were previously posted[*], but both patches were broken (as posted against upstream), hence I took full credit for doing the work and changed Marc to a reporter. The VMX APICv fixes are for bugs found when writing tests. *sigh* I didn't Cc those to stable as the odds of breaking something when touching the MSR bitmaps seemed higher than someone caring about a 10 year old bug. AMD x2AVIC support may or may not suffer similar interception bugs, but I don't have hardware to test and this already snowballed further than expected... [*] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220525173933.1611076-1-venkateshs@chromium.org Sean Christopherson (6): KVM: x86: Inject #GP if WRMSR sets reserved bits in APIC Self-IPI KVM: x86: Inject #GP on x2APIC WRMSR that sets reserved bits 63:32 KVM: x86: Mark x2APIC DFR reg as non-existent for x2APIC KVM: x86: Split out logic to generate "readable" APIC regs mask to helper KVM: VMX: Always intercept accesses to unsupported "extended" x2APIC regs KVM: VMX: Intercept reads to invalid and write-only x2APIC registers arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 40 +++++++++++++++--------------- 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) base-commit: 91dc252b0dbb6879e4067f614df1e397fec532a1 -- 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog