Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
To:     rostedt@goodmis.or, mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/eprobe: Replace kzalloc with kmalloc
Date:   Sat,  7 Jan 2023 11:43:35 +0800
Message-Id: <20230107034335.1154374-1-quanfafu@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Since this memory will be filled soon below, I feel that there is
no need for a memory of all zeros here. 'snprintf' does not return
negative num according to ISO C99, so I feel that no judgment is
needed here.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
index 352b65e2b910..cd1d271a74e7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
@@ -917,15 +917,13 @@ static int trace_eprobe_parse_filter(struct trace_eprobe *ep, int argc, const ch
 	for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
 		len += strlen(argv[i]) + 1;
 
-	ep->filter_str = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	ep->filter_str = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ep->filter_str)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	p = ep->filter_str;
 	for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) {
 		ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s ", argv[i]);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto error;
 		if (ret > len) {
 			ret = -E2BIG;
 			goto error;
-- 
2.31.1