Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: Add more syscalls to benchmark
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
References: <1668052208-14047-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
 <c71e9666-c62a-83ae-0d7b-580dc717e9f1@loongson.cn>
 <dbf82707-df17-466b-f882-aa4e25d4f629@loongson.cn>
 <CAM9d7cgH0zK-DUmUV7yw1BJBvgyxWys9zPuB5Q7dQQwta=XcGA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
From:   Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <06c8a265-0120-c4e1-6032-7bb3190df90a@loongson.cn>
Date:   Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:23:27 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cgH0zK-DUmUV7yw1BJBvgyxWys9zPuB5Q7dQQwta=XcGA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 01/07/2023 05:04 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:23 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/03/2022 05:19 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2022 11:50 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>> Tested on x86_64, arm64, mips64 and loongarch64.
>>>>
>>>> Tiezhu Yang (4):
>>>>   tools x86: Keep list sorted by number in unistd_{32,64}.h
>>>>   perf bench syscall: Introduce bench_syscall_common()
>>>>   perf bench syscall: Add getpgid syscall benchmark
>>>>   perf bench syscall: Add execve syscall benchmark
>>>>
>>>>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h | 23 ++++++---
>>>>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h | 23 ++++++---
>>>>  tools/perf/bench/bench.h                    |  2 +
>>>>  tools/perf/bench/syscall.c                  | 76
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>  tools/perf/builtin-bench.c                  |  2 +
>>>>  5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ping, any more comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tiezhu
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If this patch series has no value and is not acceptable,
>> or what should I do to update, please let me know.
>
> I'm so sorry about being late a lot.
> I don't have any objection to this series.
>
> For the execve bench, I think it's actually fork + execve
> then maybe it makes sense to have a fork only bench
> to compare the execve part precisely.
>
> But it can be added later, so
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>

Hi Namhyung,

Thank you very much. I will submit another single patch
to benchmark fork after this series is applied.

Thanks,
Tiezhu